Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18456

Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK download

Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Date 2012-08-30 17:28 -0700
References (1 earlier) <eau7385181957bce8mrlpfpllelp8mejkt@4ax.com> <50341328$0$291$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <nospam-447DF6.21411721082012@news.aioe.org> <bc809c32-3b61-4c49-a6b3-9d8b2e8cfaa3@googlegroups.com> <503c2401$0$287$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Message-ID <a676f24f-960f-423d-a239-455a9656d5df@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK download
From Bob H <bherbst65@hotmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Monday, August 27, 2012 9:55:01 PM UTC-4, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> On 8/22/2012 4:10 PM, Bob H wrote:
> 
> > Clarifying what I ultimately wanted:
> 
> > I am trying to read a "xxx.doc" file downloaded
> 
> > to a Windows Vista 32-bit operating system.
> 
> > John M wrote :
> 
> > "If you're using NetBeans, add the JARs in Tools > Libraries, where they
> 
> > can then be accessed as a group by projects that need them. Eclipse has
> 
> > a comparable feature."
> 
> >
> 
> > I am using neither NetBeans nor  Eclipse.
> 
> >
> 
> > The posts here so far indicate that I should place
> 
> > latest poi-3.8 binary jars into the folder where
> 
> > where the tools.jar is located?
> 
> 
> 
> No.
> 
> 
> 
> Most posts here indicate that you should put a ref to the
> 
> jars in the Java command line.
> 
> 
> 
> Arne

Hi All,
Thanks to you all,for your help.
I close with these remarks.
 
Yes I was able to discover how 
to direct my IDE to the path of the .POI jar 
the respective jar containing the import. 
There is a "preferences" tab
in the IDE which leads to a page 
to enter any path to individual .POI jars 
regardless of where it is. 

However in my sample 
program there were items for which 
that the .POI jar did not 
have some objects written in the 
sample. This sample program might have been written
in an earlier time when publishing of the 
Apache .POI jar was not the same as 
the latest version for download now. The 
.POI archive is available but at a 
sizable effort to discover which one it
was. Even after that, the program 
might not access the version of Word 
that wrote the .doc  that I want to read.  

So I close my quest with an observation of 
a search in comp.lang.java.programmer

In a '07 post made by Raymond F Herrera
"I need to convert MSWord ".doc" files to plain data ".rtf" ones"
The OP writes in part:

" > Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products
> The Java Glossaryhttp://mindprod.com

[Roedy's site says:]
> .POI is not what I would call 
developer friendly. "

I agree.

bH



Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download bH <bherbst65@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-21 12:31 -0700
  Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-21 15:52 -0400
    Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-08-21 13:50 -0700
      Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-21 17:13 -0400
        Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-08-22 06:25 -0700
  Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-21 14:11 -0700
    Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-21 19:00 -0400
      Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-21 21:41 -0400
        Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Bob H <bherbst65@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-22 13:10 -0700
          Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-08-22 13:32 -0700
          Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-23 12:45 -0400
          Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-27 21:50 -0400
            Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Bob H <bherbst65@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-30 17:28 -0700
              Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-08-31 15:23 -0700
        Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-27 21:49 -0400
    Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Gunter Herrmann <notformail0106@earthlink.net> - 2012-08-23 13:52 -0400
  Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Bob H <bherbst65@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-22 16:49 -0700
    Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-08-23 02:39 +0200
      Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-22 20:49 -0400
        Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Bob H <bherbst65@hotmail.com> - 2012-08-22 19:54 -0700
    Re: placement of other jars not in original in JDK  download Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-27 21:46 -0400

csiph-web