Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25614

Re: Why “new”?

Date	2011-02-09 01:10 +0800
From	Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Why “new”?
References	(10 earlier) <4d4f6ae3$1@news.x-privat.org> <4d5087dd$0$23758$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4d5129f8$1@news.x-privat.org> <k66dnXlz0e9KqszQnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <4d51611c$1@news.x-privat.org>
Message-ID	<W5ydnczs8Y1s5czQnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/8/11 11:28 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:32:21 +0800, Peter Duniho wrote:
>
>> On 2/8/11 7:33 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
>>> Since the only part of Peter's query that was obvious to me was the
>>> letter "j", it is relevant. The rest of it Peter got from his prior
>>> knowledge that J was a programming language -- knowledge I did not
>>> share with him at that time.
>>
>> Bull.
>
> How rude.

In what way?  What else would you call it when someone just starts 
pulling falsehoods out of their ass?

> The rest of your post has been ignored.

Seems unlikely.

> Get back to me when you are in a better mood.

I'm in a wonderful mood.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-09 01:10 +0800
  Re: Why “new”? Sherm Pendley <sherm.pendley@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 13:02 -0500
  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 19:51 +0100

csiph-web