Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6991
| From | Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 |
| References | (1 earlier) <4e3745a2$0$305$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <62239393-929c-4764-8c8e-9620a03a7b81@c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <j19jcs$fad$1@Gaia.teknon.de> <80346568-647c-4e27-8192-33e1765a09ce@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <slrnj45uke.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> |
| Message-ID | <DlD0q.35597$g12.31437@newsfe20.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | Public Usenet Newsgroup Access |
| Date | 2011-08-10 19:10 -0300 |
On 11-08-10 06:39 PM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote:
> Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Volker Borchert wrote:
>>> if (l instanceof RandomAccess) {
>> Tests on type like this are an antipattern.
>> Like many antipatterns there are occasions when one might
>> consider its use anyway, but it's a red flag that we're
>> probably going about things the wrong way.
>
> Are marker-interfaces (which RandomAccess is, iirc) already an
> antipattern, or is there a different way to check for them,
> or are marker-interfaces just one of the occasions where one
> would just acknowledge and consciously ignore the red flag?
>
> PS: I fully agree with your judgement *outside* the context
> of marker-interfaces, and am eager to learn *inside* that
> context.
I don't see that marker interfaces are an anti-pattern. I believe that
Bloch's comments with respect to marker interfaces (Item 37 in Effective
Java) make sense: as he points out one ought to consider a marker
interface to be a type definition.
As it is we already have a number of interfaces that have method
declarations, but they are actually the same declarations as that of a
parent. All these interfaces do is to refine a contract, and basically
create a new type just like a marker interface.
AHS
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-01 20:32 -0400
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-02 02:42 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2011-08-02 19:32 +0000
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-10 09:00 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-10 21:39 +0000
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-10 19:10 -0300
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-10 22:50 +0000
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-11 07:02 -0300
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-11 11:37 +0000
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-11 07:14 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-11 16:18 +0000
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-11 17:39 -0300
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-12 08:09 +0000
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations <supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations@averylongandannoyingdomainname.com> - 2011-08-11 09:52 -0400
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-11 17:26 -0300
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations <supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations@averylongandannoyingdomainname.com> - 2011-08-11 20:11 -0400
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-10 20:31 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-11 16:07 +0000
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-11 09:20 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-11 18:03 +0000
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-11 12:55 -0700
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-12 08:32 +0000
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations <supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations@averylongandannoyingdomainname.com> - 2011-08-12 09:09 -0400
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-12 14:38 +0000
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-12 14:51 +0000
csiph-web