Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #7912

Re: Annotations processing + type introspection + code generation

From Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Annotations processing + type introspection + code generation
Date 2011-09-12 20:21 +0200
Message-ID <9d70ubFj6fU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <b4cda2f5-442e-42f3-af75-5040215ba997@k15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <9d6rupF6dkU1@mid.individual.net> <64f52727-b962-4d6b-b445-f04321d863b7@l10g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 12.09.2011 20:00, Alex J wrote:
> On Sep 12, 8:56 pm, Robert Klemme<shortcut...@googlemail.com>  wrote:
>> [snip]
>> Why do you want to generate code?  I mean, you could process annotations
>> at runtime.  Create appropriate classes for the handling and configure
>> appropriate graphs of objects which do the work (or even use reflection).
>
> I need to generate *source* code, the boilerplate code is complex
> enough, unfortunately bytecode is not an option.
>
> One of the reason why I need generated code is that the boilerplate
> code is quite sofisticated, learning generated docs and debugging the
> generated code most likely will be required.
>
> There are other reasons, but I think that this one would be
> sufficient.

Hm...  If you need to generate a lot identical code there is something 
wrong: that identical code could be better implemented directly and 
used.  So that leaves adapters and stuff Mark mentioned for generation. 
  I am not convinced yet that it is a good idea to generate loads of 
complex code.

Can you shed some more light on the nature of the application you are 
going to implement?

Kind regards

	robert

-- 
remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end
http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Annotations processing + type introspection + code generation Alex J <vstrength@gmail.com> - 2011-09-12 06:21 -0700
  Re: Annotations processing + type introspection + code generation Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-12 18:56 +0200
    Re: Annotations processing + type introspection + code generation markspace <-@.> - 2011-09-12 10:04 -0700
      Re: Annotations processing + type introspection + code generation Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-12 19:22 +0200
        Re: Annotations processing + type introspection + code generation Alex J <vstrength@gmail.com> - 2011-09-12 11:08 -0700
    Re: Annotations processing + type introspection + code generation Alex J <vstrength@gmail.com> - 2011-09-12 11:00 -0700
      Re: Annotations processing + type introspection + code generation Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-09-12 20:21 +0200
        Re: Annotations processing + type introspection + code generation Alex J <vstrength@gmail.com> - 2011-09-12 15:06 -0700

csiph-web