Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #20221
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-12-10 11:20 -0800 |
| References | <d0be45d1-31a2-40c2-bb52-b0dc5f7b87e7@googlegroups.com> <50c1ef83$0$283$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <cd2015cc-fe9e-42e7-b28d-b0fa996f308c@googlegroups.com> <rrkac8591c9ncqcbjaad87tubgpgq65i3p@4ax.com> <50c6153d$0$287$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Message-ID | <9c20aadc-eb9a-461d-9fa6-8bcecd2874b1@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: AWT or Swing or Any other ? |
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
Arne Vajhøj wrote: > Roedy Green wrote: >> Lew wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >>> JavaFX is newer and flashier (pun intended). Arne is right to suggest > >> Read my experiences. It simply did not work. see >> http://mindprod.com/jgloss/javafx.html "Simply did not work" is not a very deep investigation. >> It was not that long ago. In geological terms? Which version did you try? When was this? What did you do exactly? > Since the page talks about JavaFX Script, then it is obsolete. "8. Does JavaFX 2 support JavaFX Script? Starting with JavaFX 2.0, JavaFX Script is no longer supported. " http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javafx/overview/faq-1446554.html#3 >> Further it has quite limited browser support. > > Browsers do not have to support JavaFX at all. Browsers support > a Java plugin. And then it is up to the Java plugin. There is a page that lists what's certified to be supported: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javafx/downloads/supportedconfigurations-1506746.html The only notable exceptions are Chrome on Mac and Internet Explorer on non-Windows platforms. > And applets are so much out of fashion anyway, that most likely > JavaFX will be more used for desktop apps than for applets. Most of the JavaFX documentation focuses on that use case. >> It is one more package the user has to install. > > No. > The JavaFX 2.0 runtime is now in the standard Java distrubution > (only in Oracle, but when talking about non-server usage, then > that is by far the most common). > >> I was unable to get >> one developer who wanted a mirror copy of my website to install Java >> to deliver it to him. He was terrified of it. Yes, one developer's pathological phobia is sufficient evidence for a worldwide policy. He needs a psychiatrist, not an engineer. > Maybe he was misinformed by someone. > :-) Or maybe he's a psycho. -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
AWT or Swing or Any other ? Sourabh Mhaisekar <sourabh8044@gmail.com> - 2012-12-07 00:53 -0800
Re: AWT or Swing or Any other ? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-07 08:30 -0500
Re: AWT or Swing or Any other ? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-12-09 12:51 -0800
Re: AWT or Swing or Any other ? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-12-09 13:14 -0800
Re: AWT or Swing or Any other ? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-09 17:21 -0500
Re: AWT or Swing or Any other ? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-12-09 19:17 -0800
Re: AWT or Swing or Any other ? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-10 12:00 -0500
Re: AWT or Swing or Any other ? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-12-10 11:20 -0800
Re: AWT or Swing or Any other ? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-12-11 18:40 -0800
Re: AWT or Swing or Any other ? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-12-11 19:28 -0800
Re: AWT or Swing or Any other ? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-12-08 00:42 -0800
Re: AWT or Swing or Any other ? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-09 17:34 -0500
Re: AWT or Swing or Any other ? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-12-10 15:46 -0500
csiph-web