Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6961
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: JavaMail bug? |
| Date | Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:34:40 +0100 |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <9aeu50FsecU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <j0fb5e$sat$1@localhost.localdomain> <995djcFq0nU1@mid.individual.net> <j0khlj$8bg$3@localhost.localdomain> <j0kilj$8bg$4@localhost.localdomain> <j0v8t7$os9$1@localhost.localdomain> <99njvpFv11U1@mid.individual.net> <j1771e$smf$1@localhost.localdomain> <99qjntFk6uU1@mid.individual.net> <j19l2v$h45$1@localhost.localdomain> <99sf3vFncoU1@mid.individual.net> <j1pp73$tje$1@localhost.localdomain> <9acnlmF447U1@mid.individual.net> <j1sdd6$kkc$1@localhost.localdomain> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net QZS22DM76npv8X/2CqmGIQop2yIXgPkvRu3VV5+MKL9iiODCqF |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:Xh6XQByxEWUEXcfjk1tWQfDX8PU= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 SUSE/3.1.11 Thunderbird/3.1.11 |
| In-Reply-To | <j1sdd6$kkc$1@localhost.localdomain> |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6961 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 09/08/11 23:47, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 13:31:49 +0100, Nigel Wade wrote: > >> I see the documentation showing use of Transport.sendMessage() (an >> abstract instance method) following a Session.getTransport(). >> > Sure, but they are all static apart from sendMessage, which is abstract. It's sendMessage() which they use in the example, not any of the static methods - that's the important fact. sendMessage() must be implemented by whatever class creates the Transport which is returned by Session.getTransport(), it could not instantiate a Transport unless it had implemented the abstract methods. -- Nigel Wade
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-23 20:32 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-07-23 20:54 -0700
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-24 09:50 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-07-24 09:27 -0700
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-25 19:36 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2011-07-25 23:00 -0700
Re: JavaMail bug? Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-07-25 23:18 -0700
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-26 17:49 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-26 17:42 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-07-25 15:40 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-25 19:54 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-25 20:11 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-29 21:32 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-07-29 16:26 -0700
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-01 13:20 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-01 21:49 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-02 16:34 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-02 20:01 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-03 09:27 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-08 22:50 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-09 13:31 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-09 22:47 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-10 09:34 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-10 19:37 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-03 09:38 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-16 21:06 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-17 10:29 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-17 19:54 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-18 09:34 +0100
Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-18 19:50 +0000
Re: JavaMail bug? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-01 12:54 +0000
csiph-web