Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6961

Re: JavaMail bug?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: JavaMail bug?
Date Wed, 10 Aug 2011 09:34:40 +0100
Lines 20
Message-ID <9aeu50FsecU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <j0fb5e$sat$1@localhost.localdomain> <995djcFq0nU1@mid.individual.net> <j0khlj$8bg$3@localhost.localdomain> <j0kilj$8bg$4@localhost.localdomain> <j0v8t7$os9$1@localhost.localdomain> <99njvpFv11U1@mid.individual.net> <j1771e$smf$1@localhost.localdomain> <99qjntFk6uU1@mid.individual.net> <j19l2v$h45$1@localhost.localdomain> <99sf3vFncoU1@mid.individual.net> <j1pp73$tje$1@localhost.localdomain> <9acnlmF447U1@mid.individual.net> <j1sdd6$kkc$1@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net QZS22DM76npv8X/2CqmGIQop2yIXgPkvRu3VV5+MKL9iiODCqF
Cancel-Lock sha1:Xh6XQByxEWUEXcfjk1tWQfDX8PU=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 SUSE/3.1.11 Thunderbird/3.1.11
In-Reply-To <j1sdd6$kkc$1@localhost.localdomain>
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6961

Show key headers only | View raw


On 09/08/11 23:47, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 13:31:49 +0100, Nigel Wade wrote:
>

>> I see the documentation showing use of Transport.sendMessage() (an
>> abstract instance method) following a Session.getTransport().
>>
> Sure, but they are all static apart from sendMessage, which is abstract.

It's sendMessage() which they use in the example, not any of the static 
methods - that's the important fact. sendMessage() must be implemented 
by whatever class creates the Transport which is returned by 
Session.getTransport(), it could not instantiate a Transport unless it 
had implemented the abstract methods.

-- 
Nigel Wade


Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-23 20:32 +0000
  Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-07-23 20:54 -0700
    Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-24 09:50 +0000
      Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-07-24 09:27 -0700
        Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-25 19:36 +0000
          Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2011-07-25 23:00 -0700
            Re: JavaMail bug? Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-07-25 23:18 -0700
              Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-26 17:49 +0000
            Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-26 17:42 +0000
  Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-07-25 15:40 +0100
    Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-25 19:54 +0000
      Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-25 20:11 +0000
        Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-07-29 21:32 +0000
          Re: JavaMail bug? Knute Johnson <september@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-07-29 16:26 -0700
          Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-01 13:20 +0100
            Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-01 21:49 +0000
              Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-02 16:34 +0100
                Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-02 20:01 +0000
                Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-03 09:27 +0100
                Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-08 22:50 +0000
                Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-09 13:31 +0100
                Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-09 22:47 +0000
                Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-10 09:34 +0100
                Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-10 19:37 +0000
                Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-03 09:38 +0100
                Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-16 21:06 +0000
                Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-17 10:29 +0100
                Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-17 19:54 +0000
                Re: JavaMail bug? Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-08-18 09:34 +0100
                Re: JavaMail bug? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-08-18 19:50 +0000
          Re: JavaMail bug? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-08-01 12:54 +0000

csiph-web