Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #20916
| X-Received | by 10.224.218.2 with SMTP id ho2mr27003791qab.8.1357199089337; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:44:49 -0800 (PST) |
|---|---|
| Received | by 10.49.15.100 with SMTP id w4mr7748413qec.26.1357199089306; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 23:44:49 -0800 (PST) |
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!ee4no12620341qab.0!news-out.google.com!k2ni4226qap.0!nntp.google.com!ee4no12741813qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Date | Wed, 2 Jan 2013 23:44:49 -0800 (PST) |
| In-Reply-To | <fde9fe58-48de-46e6-96bc-fdefcc13628f@googlegroups.com> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=95.116.27.49; posting-account=QuOrbQoAAADk1Ytmd4kkfWK7_Nh1pnw_ |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 95.116.27.49 |
| References | <c885bedb-977c-49b4-a10a-b9cdd3df1dd9@googlegroups.com> <m0sdr9-0tg.ln1@s.simpson148.btinternet.com> <9f030e71-96ab-4ead-9690-4369f4a19aa9@googlegroups.com> <pk7er9-i4j.ln1@s.simpson148.btinternet.com> <d6fdb884-3181-4b37-a011-6da19e649758@googlegroups.com> <fde9fe58-48de-46e6-96bc-fdefcc13628f@googlegroups.com> |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Message-ID | <66de9d0d-fe7c-45ba-bdb9-5a8816fc486b@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? |
| From | Saxo <jeti789@web.de> |
| Injection-Date | Thu, 03 Jan 2013 07:44:49 +0000 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:20916 |
Show key headers only | View raw
> Aside from that your comment is unsupportable. Or do you have evidence? What I mean is that almost every Java developer I met during the last 10 years didn't know what I meant when I said it's a pitty that Java does not have closures. I can't remember anyone who asked anything else in return than "and what are closures?". Having worked some of these years as a consultant I did see places. Almost nobody are those famous 95%. Funny that people get that annoyed. For the older guys that have worked with some other language than Java before the difference f.ex. between Smalltalk developers and Java developers is striking in terms of intellectual reflection, general interest, etc. Probably a good place to be nowadays is the people from the Scala camp. -- Oliver
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? jeti789@web.de - 2013-01-02 07:08 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? jeti789@web.de - 2013-01-02 07:52 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-02 17:33 +0000
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-02 11:31 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-02 12:52 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-02 20:58 -0400
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-02 17:40 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-03 20:43 -0400
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-02 23:44 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-01-03 07:57 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-03 13:22 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-01-03 16:14 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-02 21:46 +0000
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-02 17:35 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-03 02:13 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-03 06:45 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-04 21:32 +0000
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-01-04 14:38 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-04 23:45 +0000
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-01-04 17:24 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-05 13:20 +0000
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-05 01:50 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-05 11:21 +0000
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-05 04:27 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-05 12:58 +0000
csiph-web