Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6810
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 05 Aug 2011 12:39:05 -0500 |
| Date | Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:39:09 -0700 |
| From | Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.2; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 |
| References | <list-20110802003845@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <6c7f77ed-569f-47b0-a83a-931e4fa7a544@e7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com> |
| In-Reply-To | <6c7f77ed-569f-47b0-a83a-931e4fa7a544@e7g2000vbw.googlegroups.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Message-ID | <5pydnY7yVuQkt6HTnZ2dnUVZ_rudnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink) |
| Lines | 16 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 70.230.200.54 |
| X-Trace | sv3-f14bR8cDYsl1COqzv2kvqHgK8BYQT3MFQxxy+1eUMp/Q+xVpe9V0exIzeH/1mS9UshLGutjJhCsW5NS!L5sEjaJZzqhuJkjZknYSQfywpsKbJPzPjUBNsl0fjqTfjSEgW+S4Lnz8HMFMy/8KLSw/tuLC2/Sp!PdYKKqqkFhV60Nosh25QlcWumDnmfb4+fDosrKjnYqv7Pg== |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1786 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6810 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 8/5/2011 2:11 AM, Raymond Tong wrote: > It depends on the implmentation of list. It shouldn't. > If the list implements RandomAccess interface, it is recommended to > call get(i) instead of using iterator(). Why? I'm dealing right now with some code that followed that advice, so that changes will be needed throughout the code to change the choice of List implementation. The only reason random access is needed is because of code that could have used iterator(), but didn't. Patricia
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Raymond Tong <raytong82@gmail.com> - 2011-08-05 02:11 -0700 Re: looping through a list, starting at 1 Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-05 10:39 -0700
csiph-web