Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18161

Re: Another post where Paul G Derbyshire, net abuser, is tarred and feathered

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Aug 19, 3:20 am, This account has been banned because it violated
the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laugh...@u.kook> wrote:
[Groups trimmed, spammer!]
> AUK's July Kook Of The Month, Paul G. Derbyshire AKA Nadegda

Still unproven, kook!

> <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:16:10 -0500, teevee-phan wrote:
>
> >> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 07:33:49 GMT, in alt.paul-derbyshire.fix.it.now
> >> Account Banned gave the Usenet Community a Gift:
>
> >> One SPANKED Derbyshire of Pembroke Ontario, no less!
>
> >>>Nadegda Derbyshite <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> [ed.Note]  SpnakTard above in-da-houz!
>
> >>>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:08:45 +0000, This account has been banned
> >>>> because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use wrote:
>
> >>>>> kensi derbyshite <kensi_kensing...@zoonoses.de> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On 26/07/2012 11:45 PM, This account has been banned because it
> >>>>>> violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use wrote:
> >>>>>>> Paula Andrew-Wilson-Derbyshite <awils384...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> P<slap>  ==<restore>==
>
> >>>>>http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?user=awils3848x9%40gmail.com
>
> >>>>> Well look at that; a history of a few days and a handful of posts.
>
> >>>> Not relevant to your k'laim that he's a specific other person, which
> >>>> remains unsubstantiated.
>
> >> Paul Derbyshire, you have an established history of using hit-and-run
> >> Gargle Gropes sockpuppets.  Doesn't your Aspergers let you remember?
>
> > Oh, hello, Account Banned.
>
> Hello. Paul G. Derbyshire, winner of the Clueless Newbie of the Month in
> April - May 2009 with your sockpuppet, 'Seamus MacRae'.

More unproved assertions from the world's most brainless kook!

> > Morphing *and* spamming this time<SPANK>
>
> I am doing neither, you clueless onion-routed Seamus-breathed netabusing kook.

Multiposting is considered spamming, or didn't you know? And you've
posted with several nyms, and been exposed as doing so.

> > This post of yours<SPANK>
>
> MID  <502f251b$0$6460$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com> isn't my post,

Sure it is. It's an almost exact copy of
<xH5Rr.27106$%Y2.25446@newsfe02.iad>, which has these headers:

Path: ...!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-
mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!
news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!
post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe02.iad.POSTED!096c412d!not-for-
mail
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,alt.paul-derbyshire.fix.it.now,alt.paul-
derbyshire.fix.it
Subject: The Point where Paul Derbyshire is handed his ass <Re:
Question For The Theorists>
From: This account has been banned because it violated the Google
Groups Terms Of Use <laughing@u.kook>
References: <junl2c$22$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <junu4m
$a04$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
<juo0p8$da0$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <RSNPr.
24717$jA7.13968@newsfe15.iad>
<3843e5e0-8cde-427d-864c-76647932d863@googlegroups.com> <D9oQr.
1403$Yf7.643@newsfe16.iad> <jut7fh$i8d$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1eMQr.
42252$7y4.1728@newsfe23.iad> <jv054b$4ep$4@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.24
X-Face: #Fx4MVYx@8oV>i@>W#u@173&EA_wGKYm{M">l;l'd8\Rtu#0n*P,-ASm#?cT/}
M/N;k)vnk S>P!nV~"EE\cyYU4d"'%Ms'>Y*dP?RZrg]Lp.~2H7j/
Rw5K5`WHH~<BAu``=NG/!3jk))7rw)AT1&< eWt@_lrjb{In`1fehPHv9h!nt#o|
&-8n1ITN_|K<*r>-${"tqAUBT
Lines: 811
Message-ID: <xH5Rr.27106$%Y2.25446@newsfe02.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 07:33:49 UTC
Organization: TeraNews.com
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 07:33:49 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 57559

Are you going to claim that that wasn't your post? Because either the
text of both posts is of your authorship, or the text of neither post
is. Which is it, kooky?

> > You made a substantively identical one
> > a week or two ago, in alt.usenet.kooks, with message-ID <xH5Rr.27106$%
> > Y2.25446@newsfe02.iad>.
>
> Wrong, fuckwit;

They're not *exactly* the same, 'tis true. Obviously to avoid one
being blocked by newsservers as a duplicate of the other. But it was
easy enough to get around that by making a slight edit.

And now there are two MORE copies of that post found with a quick
search, both of them posted just to comp.lang.java.programmer through
yet *another* server.

That gets the BI of your <xH5Rr.27106$%Y2.25446@newsfe02.iad> post up
around 5 I think. That makes you a spammer; a bush league spammer to
be sure, but a spammer nonetheless!

> And I don't have an account with Shared Secrets and never
> have had one

The evidence says otherwise, kook!

> > My response to your garbage is at <jv4oi6$i1g$1@dont-email.me> and<SPANK>
>
> Your 'response' proves you're still a Clueless Newbie, Seamus Breath.

It proves neither that Nadegda is clueless nor that she's this Seamus
fellow, fuckwit! It does, however, prove that you're a spammer and a
sock user.

> It's time you were fully spanked for that psychosis you call your response -
>
> 1 - 69.196.212.166 wasn't in Tullahoma, Tennessee at the time MID
> <4LCdnVBJT5MV--zfRVn-3A@rogers.com> was posted, you stupid little fuckwit.

Proof?

> Not even Bullis would be st00pid enough to quote current whois data as
> evidence of the IP's location when that IP address range has been reallocated
> since you used it - as the whois record of change clearly shows.

It doesn't show that it wasn't in Tullahoma, Tennessee beforehand,
though, only that it was afterward. Before that change it could have
been anywhere, including Tullahoma, Tennessee. And it's more likely to
have moved a little than to have moved a lot, absent any other
information.

> 2 - Since when did Rogers Cable ever run services in the southern USA, you
> brain-dead glow-worm who thinks he's a flame giant?

Message-ID domains aren't proof of anything, kook! Lots of software
let you set the MID domain and lots of newsservers won't override it.
And back then lots of servers still allowed path-preloading, too.

> Or did you choose to ignore the 'rogers.com' present in your message headers,

You never proved that that was Nadegda's message, you fucking halfwit.
Now you just kookily assert it without proof as if it was self-
evidently true.

> Anyone can look up MID
> <etblmp$8qd$1@aioe.org>, a posting in which you used your Rogers email
> address <derbyshire2@rogers.com>, in 2007 in case of any doubt.

Anyone can post through AIOE with any email address in the From, you
fucking nitwit -- you've even relied on that when claiming that
multiple AIOE users are the same person that have different From
emails in their posts.

And of course you have no proof that Nadegda wrote *that* post anymore
than you do that she wrote the one with the Tullahoma IP.

> Then, for conclusive evidence, how can anyone go past what you posted in MID
> <-YGdnQuSz4hR8gzfRVn-2w@rogers.com>?
>
> "http://ca.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/derbyshire2@rogers.com/detail_hires?.dir=/58da&.dnm=3f6a.jpg"

I get a host unknown error from trying to view this JPG file that you
klaim proves something, kook. And here I thought posting a link to a
clearly photoshopped JPG was about as stupid as you would get. Boy,
was I wrong about *that*. It's clear now that your stupidity knows no
bounds!

And, of course, you have failed to prove that Nadegda wrote <-
YGdnQuSz4hR8gzfRVn-2w@rogers.com>. You just ask everyone to take that
on faith, like with so many of your OTHER kooky klames!

> 3 - Comparing MID <1134233498.157084.88860@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> and
> MID <4LCdnVBJT5MV--zfRVn-3A@rogers.com> shows they have the same IP address

Those posts were made eight months apart, you FUCKING IMBECILE. What
are the odds that that IP wasn't dynamically reallocated in THAT much
time? Remember, DHCP leases normally last hours, days AT MOST, and
many people shut everything off at their power bar nightly, including
any modem or router they have.

> which was then a Rogers IP address

Which you haven't proved, since as YOU YOURSELF pointed out it's been
sold and bought by a different ISP since then and thus the publicly
available records only say what ISP currently owns it and for how long
they have had it.

Of course, even if it WAS a Rogers IP address, SO WHAT? You haven't
proved that any of those posts are by Nadegda and you certainly
haven't proved that everyone posting via Rogers is Derbyshire.
Besides, I thought you said it was everyone posting via Sympatico
that's Derbyshire. MAKE UP YOUR KOOKY MIND, KOOK!

> - and that the latter post was made via the Rogers' Usenet service and uses a
> munged version of the same unmunged address used in the Google Groups post.

Anyone can use any email address on usenet, for the most part,
especially munged ones.

> Since you're still not satisfied, try explaining how you replied to your
> post as 'Twisted One' <twisted0n3@gmail.invalid> which you made in MID
> <DfSdnQlpUqe4XpbfRVn-2g@rogers.com> with the same IP address, to your
> own post using the address 'Twisted One' <twisted0n3@gmail.com> in
> MID  <DfSdnQlpUqe4XpbfRVn-2g@rogers.com> without any gnashing of teeth or
> cries of forgery.

What are you smoking, anyway, and can I have some? It must be some
pretty fucking good shit, if it makes you think that claiming that the
SAME MESSAGE-ID is TWO DIFFERENT POSTS is going to do anything except
make you look REALLY, REALLY STUPID!

> And don't forget about MID <-YGdnQuSz4hR8gzfRVn-2w@rogers.com>, fuckwit.

ca.pg.photos.yahoo.com: Host unknown, fuckwit!

> 4 - In your so-called 'response' of <jv4oi6$i1g$1@dont-email.me>, you snipped
> out (4), (5), and (6) because<SMACK!>

Because she knew that it sufficed to break only a couple of links in
your chain to prove the whole chain worthless, you FUCKING KOOK. If
you claim to have proved that A is Z by proving that A is B, that B is
C, that C is D, and so on up to Y is Z, then it's enough to prove that
B isn't C and that K isn't L and your claim that A is Z falls flat on
its FUCKING FACE! Hell, even proving that B isn't C by itself would
suffice, but she went that extra mile to show what a fool you were!

<cackle>

And since again a chain is broken if any link of it is broken, I don't
feel the need to bother addressing most of the rest of your latest
worthless post. Nadegda or kensi might want to take a crack at it, and
if so, all the power to them.

Hope you enjoyed making a colossal fool of yourself yet again,
fuckhead!

Here's a few more pokes though, just for good measure.

> By examining the aioe.org Innreport logs, I was able to show a clear path
> between the IP address 76.65.37.159, your 'kensi' and 'thoolen' sockpuppets,
> and you on March 1, 2012 - and another path on July 3, 2012 from you, to
> the IP address 76.65.46.53, and to your other aioe sockspuppets , including
> 'kensi'.

Your post with that klame was already shredded quite thoroughly by, if
I recall correctly, *all three* FNVWs in separate posts. There, too,
your chains were full of holes, including your kooky klame that two
different IPs were the same and another kooky klame that posts made
months apart with the same IP cannot possibly have been made by two
different people. (That sounds familiar. I wonder why? Oh yeah because
you did the same thing again in THIS post. Kooks like you never
learn!)

The most you proved was that several posters share the same ISP,
which, since apparently it's an ISP with several million customers,
actually means nothing whatsoever, you BLITHERING FOOL.

> But they're still in the same range allocated to Sympatico, and the Radius
> logs held by Sympatico will connect those IPs to your account.

Logs that you have no access to, and which after this much time may
very well no longer exist, you imbecile.

> 9 - In point (9), I described where your Eternal-September posting host
> changed between 10:18 GMT and 11:01 GMT on 9 July 2012 - which corresponds
> to how your IP address also changed with your monkey-like impersonation of
> Tholen's trash using your Google Groups sock, <tholen01@gmail.com>.  There
> was also a consequent change of hostmasks in your aioe.org sockpuppets.

Didn't Nadegda respond to that by pointing out that Microsoft released
one of their updates at around that time? That means that tons of
people would have rebooted their systems all across the world at that
time. Any of them that don't have a router would have got new IP
addresses as part of that reboot. So several posters' IPs changing at
around that time doesn't even amount to a spooky coincidence, let
alone proof of anything. What REALLY mystifies me, though, is why
you'd want to relive the embarrassment of that particularly
spectacular blunder on your part by reminding everyone of it all over
again! Oh, but you're just a stupid kook, so you can be expected to do
stupid things like that, can't you?

<cackle>

> The fact that you're using Tor with your new Google Groups socks

Ah, the old "only one person in the whole world could plausibly be
using Tor and Google Groups together" line! Are you going to use
another photoshopped picture to try to prove something next? Because
that would make your post here contain EVERY SINGLE type of kooky
stupidity we've come to expect from you in ONE SINGLE POST!

> 10 - How many times have you been spanked before AUK did it , Paula?

[snip kooky lits o' MIDs]

None of which you've proved have any connection whatsoever to Nadegda,
you fucking loser.

> Let [Tard] The AUK Peg Boi come to your rescue, as he relocates Ontario next
> to the ocean, or k'laim two IP addresses are the same

K'laiming two distinct IP addresses were the same was *your* kooky
move, stupid, not Phoenix's, or did you forget?

> [Tard] k'laim 'Derbyshire was spanked off of Usenet years ago and you're chasing
> a ghost' -  when a photo on your Facebook page plainly shows a screenshot from
> your computer running a Pan newsreader.  Just so we can point and laugh.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! So we can point and laugh at you, for using an
obvious photoshop job as "proof" of something YET AGAIN!!!

> http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=473884075973511
>
> So, Paul Derbyshire isn't interested in Usenet any more, huh?

Photoshopped! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

> SPANK!

SPANK!!

> <chortle>

<cackle!!>

> Lastly, each time you sneck out groups, I will add them back in and add
> even more groups on top of the ones you sneck, you retarded little coward.

Go right ahead, you retarded little spammer, and keep including nanau
when you do so! Do it when you reply to my posts too! And then see how
long your net access lasts, you fucking net abusing spamming KOOK!!

<cackle!!!>

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Post where Paul G Derbyshire is handed his ass <Re: Question For The Theorists> "teevee-phan" <tvf@webTV.mail.net> - 2012-08-18 00:16 -0500
  Re: The Post where Paul G Derbyshire is handed his ass <Re: Question For The Theorists> Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2012-08-18 07:39 +0000
    Another post where Paul G Derbyshire, net abuser, is tarred and feathered This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laughing@u.kook> - 2012-08-19 03:20 +0000
      Re: Another post where Paul G Derbyshire, net abuser, is tarred and feathered Andrew Wilson <awils3848x9@gmail.com> - 2012-08-19 21:25 -0700
        Re: Another post where Paul G Derbyshire, net abuser, is tarred and feathered This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laughing@u.kook> - 2012-08-20 05:19 +0000
          Re: Another post where Paul G Derbyshire, net abuser, is tarred and feathered Fred Hall <fkhall@gmail.com> - 2012-08-20 00:45 -0500
            Re: Another post where Paul G Derbyshire, net abuser, is tarred and feathered This account has been banned because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use <laughing@u.kook> - 2012-08-20 06:09 +0000
              Re: Another post where Paul G Derbyshire, net abuser, is tarred and feathered Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2012-08-20 05:40 -0700

csiph-web