Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #23047
| Date | 2013-03-21 17:34 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: UI framework in gwt |
| References | <kieqab$fkb$1@shakotay.alphanet.ch> <d5698f23-e44a-46d2-a4cf-cf36acbc94f7@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <514b7d03$0$32116$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink) |
| Organization | SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source |
On 3/21/2013 5:23 PM, Gerbrand van Dieijen wrote:
> Big advantage of GWT is that the client-side code runs at the client,
> just as in Swing. In many other ('older') webframeworks, including
> ajax-ones, client-side code was rendered at the server and then send
> to the client (the browser). I've worked with GWT, it works
> reasonable nice. You don't have to code any Javascript.
The code is very nice.
But troubleshooting can sometimes be tough.
> Last but not least: why not stick to Java? If all goes well, there
> will be a JavaFX release for Android which would making your
> application tabled/mobile capable easily. And there are some reports
> there might be even a way to run Java application on Ios (IPhone,
> IPad) even. In my opinion, the UX of stand-alone client-side
> frameworks is still beer then the ones that run in a browser.
Web vs fat client is often a high level strategic decision
where specific UX aspects are only a very small part of
the picture.
Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
UI framework in gwt 1connu <1connu999@gmail.com> - 2013-03-21 12:18 +0100
Re: UI framework in gwt Gerbrand van Dieijen <gerbrand@vandieijen.nl> - 2013-03-21 14:23 -0700
Re: UI framework in gwt Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-03-21 17:34 -0400
Re: UI framework in gwt 1connu <1connu999@gmail.com> - 2013-03-22 17:03 +0100
csiph-web