Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18235

Re: Another post where Paul G Derbyshire, net abuser, is tarred and fea

Show all headers | View raw

From: Andrew Wilson <awils3848x9@gmail.com>

On Aug 19, 3:20 am, This account has been banned because it violated the Google 
Groups Terms Of Use <laugh...@u.kook> wrote: [Groups trimmed, spammer!]
> AUK's July Kook Of The Month, Paul G. Derbyshire AKA Nadegda

Still unproven, kook!

> <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Aug 2012 00:16:10 -0500, teevee-phan wrote:
>
> >> On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 07:33:49 GMT, in alt.paul-derbyshire.fix.it.now
> >> Account Banned gave the Usenet Community a Gift:
>
> >> One SPANKED Derbyshire of Pembroke Ontario, no less!
>
> >>>Nadegda Derbyshite <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> [ed.Note]  SpnakTard above in-da-houz!
>
> >>>> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:08:45 +0000, This account has been banned
> >>>> because it violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use wrote:
>
> >>>>> kensi derbyshite <kensi_kensing...@zoonoses.de> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> On 26/07/2012 11:45 PM, This account has been banned because it
> >>>>>> violated the Google Groups Terms Of Use wrote:
> >>>>>>> Paula Andrew-Wilson-Derbyshite <awils384...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> P<slap>  ==<restore>==
>
> >>>>>http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?user=awils3848x9%40gmail.com
>
> >>>>> Well look at that; a history of a few days and a handful of posts.
>
> >>>> Not relevant to your k'laim that he's a specific other person, which
> >>>> remains unsubstantiated.
>
> >> Paul Derbyshire, you have an established history of using hit-and-run
> >> Gargle Gropes sockpuppets.  Doesn't your Aspergers let you remember?
>
> > Oh, hello, Account Banned.
>
> Hello. Paul G. Derbyshire, winner of the Clueless Newbie of the Month in
> April - May 2009 with your sockpuppet, 'Seamus MacRae'.

More unproved assertions from the world's most brainless kook!

> > Morphing *and* spamming this time<SPANK>
>
> I am doing neither, you clueless onion-routed Seamus-breathed netabusing
kook.

Multiposting is considered spamming, or didn't you know? And you've posted with 
several nyms, and been exposed as doing so.

> > This post of yours<SPANK>
>
> MID  <502f251b$0$6460$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com> isn't my post,

Sure it is. It's an almost exact copy of
<xH5Rr.27106$%Y2.25446@newsfe02.iad>, which has these headers:

Path: ...!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal- 
mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!npeer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!
news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!
post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe02.iad.POSTED!096c412d!not-for-
mail
Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,alt.paul-derbyshire.fix.it.now,alt.paul- 
derbyshire.fix.it
Subject: The Point where Paul Derbyshire is handed his ass <Re:
Question For The Theorists>
From: This account has been banned because it violated the Google
Groups Terms Of Use <laughing@u.kook> References: 
<junl2c$22$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <junu4m
$a04$2@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
<juo0p8$da0$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> <RSNPr.
24717$jA7.13968@newsfe15.iad>
<3843e5e0-8cde-427d-864c-76647932d863@googlegroups.com> <D9oQr.
1403$Yf7.643@newsfe16.iad> <jut7fh$i8d$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1eMQr. 
42252$7y4.1728@newsfe23.iad> <jv054b$4ep$4@dont-email.me> User-Agent: 
Xnews/2006.08.24
X-Face: #Fx4MVYx@8oV>i@>W#u@173&EA_wGKYm{M">l;l'd8\Rtu#0n*P,-ASm#?cT/} 
M/N;k)vnk S>P!nV~"EE\cyYU4d"'%Ms'>Y*dP?RZrg]Lp.~2H7j/ 
Rw5K5`WHH~<BAu``=NG/!3jk))7rw)AT1&< eWt@_lrjb{In`1fehPHv9h!nt#o|
&-8n1ITN_|K<*r>-${"tqAUBT
Lines: 811
Message-ID: <xH5Rr.27106$%Y2.25446@newsfe02.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 
07:33:49 UTC Organization: TeraNews.com
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 07:33:49 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 57559

Are you going to claim that that wasn't your post? Because either the text of 
both posts is of your authorship, or the text of neither post is. Which is it, 
kooky?

> > You made a substantively identical one
> > a week or two ago, in alt.usenet.kooks, with message-ID <xH5Rr.27106$%
> > Y2.25446@newsfe02.iad>.
>
> Wrong, fuckwit;

They're not *exactly* the same, 'tis true. Obviously to avoid one being blocked 
by newsservers as a duplicate of the other. But it was easy enough to get 
around that by making a slight edit.

And now there are two MORE copies of that post found with a quick search, both 
of them posted just to comp.lang.java.programmer through yet *another* server.

That gets the BI of your <xH5Rr.27106$%Y2.25446@newsfe02.iad> post up around 5 
I think. That makes you a spammer; a bush league spammer to be sure, but a 
spammer nonetheless!

> And I don't have an account with Shared Secrets and never
> have had one

The evidence says otherwise, kook!

> > My response to your garbage is at <jv4oi6$i1g$1@dont-email.me> and<SPANK>
>
> Your 'response' proves you're still a Clueless Newbie, Seamus Breath.

It proves neither that Nadegda is clueless nor that she's this Seamus fellow, 
fuckwit! It does, however, prove that you're a spammer and a sock user.

> It's time you were fully spanked for that psychosis you call your response -
>
> 1 - 69.196.212.166 wasn't in Tullahoma, Tennessee at the time MID
> <4LCdnVBJT5MV--zfRVn-3A@rogers.com> was posted, you stupid little fuckwit.

Proof?

> Not even Bullis would be st00pid enough to quote current whois data as
> evidence of the IP's location when that IP address range has been reallocated
> since you used it - as the whois record of change clearly shows.

It doesn't show that it wasn't in Tullahoma, Tennessee beforehand, though, only 
that it was afterward. Before that change it could have been anywhere, 
including Tullahoma, Tennessee. And it's more likely to have moved a little 
than to have moved a lot, absent any other information.

> 2 - Since when did Rogers Cable ever run services in the southern USA, you
> brain-dead glow-worm who thinks he's a flame giant?

Message-ID domains aren't proof of anything, kook! Lots of software let you set 
the MID domain and lots of newsservers won't override it. And back then lots of 
servers still allowed path-preloading, too.

> Or did you choose to ignore the 'rogers.com' present in your message headers,

You never proved that that was Nadegda's message, you fucking halfwit. Now you 
just kookily assert it without proof as if it was self- evidently true.

> Anyone can look up MID
> <etblmp$8qd$1@aioe.org>, a posting in which you used your Rogers email
> address <derbyshire2@rogers.com>, in 2007 in case of any doubt.

Anyone can post through AIOE with any email address in the From, you fucking 
nitwit -- you've even relied on that when claiming that multiple AIOE users are 
the same person that have different From emails in their posts.

And of course you have no proof that Nadegda wrote *that* post anymore than you 
do that she wrote the one with the Tullahoma IP.

> Then, for conclusive evidence, how can anyone go past what you posted in MID
> <-YGdnQuSz4hR8gzfRVn-2w@rogers.com>?
>
> "http://ca.pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/derbyshire2@rogers.com/detail_hires?.dir=/5
8da&.dnm?6a.jpg"

I get a host unknown error from trying to view this JPG file that you klaim 
proves something, kook. And here I thought posting a link to a clearly 
photoshopped JPG was about as stupid as you would get. Boy, was I wrong about 
*that*. It's clear now that your stupidity knows no bounds!

And, of course, you have failed to prove that Nadegda wrote <- 
YGdnQuSz4hR8gzfRVn-2w@rogers.com>. You just ask everyone to take that on faith, 
like with so many of your OTHER kooky klames!

> 3 - Comparing MID <1134233498.157084.88860@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> and
> MID <4LCdnVBJT5MV--zfRVn-3A@rogers.com> shows they have the same IP address

Those posts were made eight months apart, you FUCKING IMBECILE. What are the 
odds that that IP wasn't dynamically reallocated in THAT much time? Remember, 
DHCP leases normally last hours, days AT MOST, and many people shut everything 
off at their power bar nightly, including any modem or router they have.

> which was then a Rogers IP address

Which you haven't proved, since as YOU YOURSELF pointed out it's been sold and 
bought by a different ISP since then and thus the publicly available records 
only say what ISP currently owns it and for how long they have had it.

Of course, even if it WAS a Rogers IP address, SO WHAT? You haven't proved that 
any of those posts are by Nadegda and you certainly haven't proved that 
everyone posting via Rogers is Derbyshire. Besides, I thought you said it was 
everyone posting via Sympatico that's Derbyshire. MAKE UP YOUR KOOKY MIND, 
KOOK!

> - and that the latter post was made via the Rogers' Usenet service and uses a
> munged version of the same unmunged address used in the Google Groups post.

Anyone can use any email address on usenet, for the most part, especially 
munged ones.

> Since you're still not satisfied, try explaining how you replied to your
> post as 'Twisted One' <twisted0n3@gmail.invalid> which you made in MID
> <DfSdnQlpUqe4XpbfRVn-2g@rogers.com> with the same IP address, to your
> own post using the address 'Twisted One' <twisted0n3@gmail.com> in
> MID  <DfSdnQlpUqe4XpbfRVn-2g@rogers.com> without any gnashing of teeth or
> cries of forgery.

What are you smoking, anyway, and can I have some? It must be some pretty 
fucking good shit, if it makes you think that claiming that the SAME MESSAGE-ID 
is TWO DIFFERENT POSTS is going to do anything except make you look REALLY, 
REALLY STUPID!

> And don't forget about MID <-YGdnQuSz4hR8gzfRVn-2w@rogers.com>, fuckwit.

ca.pg.photos.yahoo.com: Host unknown, fuckwit!

> 4 - In your so-called 'response' of <jv4oi6$i1g$1@dont-email.me>, you snipped
> out (4), (5), and (6) because<SMACK!>

Because she knew that it sufficed to break only a couple of links in your chain 
to prove the whole chain worthless, you FUCKING KOOK. If you claim to have 
proved that A is Z by proving that A is B, that B is C, that C is D, and so on 
up to Y is Z, then it's enough to prove that B isn't C and that K isn't L and 
your claim that A is Z falls flat on its FUCKING FACE! Hell, even proving that 
B isn't C by itself would suffice, but she went that extra mile to show what a 
fool you were!

<cackle>

And since again a chain is broken if any link of it is broken, I don't feel the 
need to bother addressing most of the rest of your latest worthless post. 
Nadegda or kensi might want to take a crack at it, and if so, all the power to 
them.

Hope you enjoyed making a colossal fool of yourself yet again, fuckhead!

Here's a few more pokes though, just for good measure.

> By examining the aioe.org Innreport logs, I was able to show a clear path
> between the IP address 76.65.37.159, your 'kensi' and 'thoolen' sockpuppets,
> and you on March 1, 2012 - and another path on July 3, 2012 from you, to
> the IP address 76.65.46.53, and to your other aioe sockspuppets , including
> 'kensi'.

Your post with that klame was already shredded quite thoroughly by, if I recall 
correctly, *all three* FNVWs in separate posts. There, too, your chains were 
full of holes, including your kooky klame that two different IPs were the same 
and another kooky klame that posts made months apart with the same IP cannot 
possibly have been made by two different people. (That sounds familiar. I 
wonder why? Oh yeah because you did the same thing again in THIS post. Kooks 
like you never learn!)

The most you proved was that several posters share the same ISP, which, since 
apparently it's an ISP with several million customers, actually means nothing 
whatsoever, you BLITHERING FOOL.

> But they're still in the same range allocated to Sympatico, and the Radius
> logs held by Sympatico will connect those IPs to your account.

Logs that you have no access to, and which after this much time may very well 
no longer exist, you imbecile.

> 9 - In point (9), I described where your Eternal-September posting host
> changed between 10:18 GMT and 11:01 GMT on 9 July 2012 - which corresponds
> to how your IP address also changed with your monkey-like impersonation of
> Tholen's trash using your Google Groups sock, <tholen01@gmail.com>.  There
> was also a consequent change of hostmasks in your aioe.org sockpuppets.

Didn't Nadegda respond to that by pointing out that Microsoft released one of 
their updates at around that time? That means that tons of people would have 
rebooted their systems all across the world at that time. Any of them that 
don't have a router would have got new IP addresses as part of that reboot. So 
several posters' IPs changing at around that time doesn't even amount to a 
spooky coincidence, let alone proof of anything. What REALLY mystifies me, 
though, is why you'd want to relive the embarrassment of that particularly 
spectacular blunder on your part by reminding everyone of it all over again! 
Oh, but you're just a stupid kook, so you can be expected to do stupid things 
like that, can't you?

<cackle>

> The fact that you're using Tor with your new Google Groups socks

Ah, the old "only one person in the whole world could plausibly be using Tor 
and Google Groups together" line! Are you going to use another photoshopped 
picture to try to prove something next? Because that would make your post here 
contain EVERY SINGLE type of kooky stupidity we've come to expect from you in 
ONE SINGLE POST!

> 10 - How many times have you been spanked before AUK did it , Paula?

[snip kooky lits o' MIDs]

None of which you've proved have any connection whatsoever to Nadegda, you 
fucking loser.

> Let [Tard] The AUK Peg Boi come to your rescue, as he relocates Ontario next
> to the ocean, or k'laim two IP addresses are the same

K'laiming two distinct IP addresses were the same was *your* kooky move, 
stupid, not Phoenix's, or did you forget?

> [Tard] k'laim 'Derbyshire was spanked off of Usenet years ago and you're
chasing
> a ghost' -  when a photo on your Facebook page plainly shows a screenshot
from
> your computer running a Pan newsreader.  Just so we can point and laugh.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! So we can point and laugh at you, for using an obvious 
photoshop job as "proof" of something YET AGAIN!!!

> http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=473884075973511
>
> So, Paul Derbyshire isn't interested in Usenet any more, huh?

Photoshopped! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

> SPANK!

SPANK!!

> <chortle>

<cackle!!>

> Lastly, each time you sneck out groups, I will add them back in and add
> even more groups on top of the ones you sneck, you retarded little coward.

Go right ahead, you retarded little spammer, and keep including nanau when you 
do so! Do it when you reply to my posts too! And then see how long your net 
access lasts, you fucking net abusing spamming KOOK!!

<cackle!!!>

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Another post where Paul G Derbyshire, net abuser, is tarred and fea "Andrew Wilson" <andrew.wilson@1:261/38.remove-fzq-this> - 2012-08-20 18:58 +0000

csiph-web