Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18012
| From | "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-rj6-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Swing |
| Message-ID | <502FD852.56953.calajapr@time.synchro.net> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | <502D38C3.56891.calajapr@time.synchro.net> |
| Date | 2012-08-18 18:36 +0000 |
| Organization | tds.net |
To: Qu0ll From: Arne Vajhoj <arne@vajhoej.dk> On 8/16/2012 5:14 AM, Qu0ll wrote: > "Roedy Green" wrote in message > news:5csl28pian0391sl4iehdl47hp289i5ai7@4ax.com... >> Oracle is pushing JavaFX, but I don't think it will go anywhere. It >> does not integrate. So Swing is it for now. > > Doesn't integrate??? With what exactly? Roedy probably just made it up. You should not be surprised if you never get an an answer. > JavaFX is just another Java > API, is now included as part of the JDK (as of 7 Update 6), > interoperates seamlessly with Swing, works with all standard Java SE > packages, works well with other JVM-based languages and has some very, > very impressive features. JavaFX is 10 years newer than Swing and it shows. > If you want to develop new GUI apps with Java > then JavaFX is a "no brainer" as they say in the states. > > Swing will hang around for a long time yet but is not being actively > developed by Oracle anymore and good luck trying to get any bugs in it > fixed. They are pouring an enormous amount of resources into JavaFX and > rightly so - it's great technology. > > IMHO you'd be nuts to start a new project with Swing instead of FX. JavaFX is certainly worth considering. But one may have a need to support a platform where JavaFX is not available yet. Arne --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38) --- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Swing "bob smith" <bob.smith@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
Re: Swing "markspace" <markspace@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
Re: Swing "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
Re: Swing "Roedy Green" <roedy.green@1:261/38.remove-z1z-this> - 2012-08-15 18:36 +0000
Re: Swing "Jeff Higgins" <jeff.higgins@1:261/38.remove-z1z-this> - 2012-08-15 18:36 +0000
Re: Swing "Qu0ll" <qu0ll@1:261/38.remove-s96-this> - 2012-08-16 19:16 +0000
Re: Swing "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-rj6-this> - 2012-08-18 18:36 +0000
Re: Swing "Qu0ll" <qu0ll@1:261/38.remove-v8v-this> - 2012-08-19 18:11 +0000
Re: Swing "markspace" <markspace@1:261/38.remove-v8v-this> - 2012-08-19 18:11 +0000
Re: Swing "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-fzq-this> - 2012-08-20 18:58 +0000
Re: Swing "markspace" <markspace@1:261/38.remove-fzq-this> - 2012-08-20 18:58 +0000
Re: Swing "Qu0ll" <qu0ll@1:261/38.remove-fzq-this> - 2012-08-20 18:58 +0000
Re: Swing "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-fzq-this> - 2012-08-20 18:58 +0000
csiph-web