Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #17855
| From | "Arne Vajhøj" <������ høj@1:261/38.remove-odu-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: hashCode |
| Message-ID | <50294F03.56803.calajapr@time.synchro.net> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Date | 2012-08-13 19:38 +0000 |
| Organization | tds.net |
To: Patricia Shanahan From: "=?UTF-8?B?QXJuZSBWYWpow7hq?=" <=?utf-8?b?qxjuzsbwywpow7hq?=@1:261/38.rem ove-nlb-this> To: Patricia Shanahan From: =?UTF-8?B?QXJuZSBWYWpow7hq?= <arne@vajhoej.dk> On 8/12/2012 12:40 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > Keeping hashCode as an Object method but making it useless for bucket > selection unless overridden would not be a good alternative. > > A more reasonable alternative would be to have hashCode as the only > member of a HashKey interface that would be implemented by every class > whose objects are intended to be suitable for use as has keys. Those > objects that have a hashCode would still have to have a usable one, but > some classes would not implement HashKey and not have a hashCode at all. That would avoid using the hash for classes where it does not make much sense. I like it. Given that there is a gazillion lines of code out there that stores Object, then it can not be changed. Arne -+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1 + Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38) -+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24 --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38) --- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <������ høj@1:261/38.remove-odu-this> - 2012-08-13 19:38 +0000
csiph-web