Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #17851
| From | "Arne Vajhøj" <������ høj@1:261/38.remove-odu-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: hashCode |
| Message-ID | <50294F02.56798.calajapr@time.synchro.net> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | <502943B2.56752.calajapr@time.synchro.net> |
| Date | 2012-08-13 19:38 +0000 |
| Organization | tds.net |
To: Lew
From: "=?UTF-8?B?QXJuZSBWYWpow7hq?=" <=?utf-8?b?qxjuzsbwywpow7hq?=@1:261/38.rem
ove-nlb-this>
To: Lew
From: =?UTF-8?B?QXJuZSBWYWpow7hq?= <arne@vajhoej.dk>
On 8/12/2012 12:46 AM, Lew wrote:
> Arne Vajh-,j wrote:
>> The original questions were:
>>
>> #Is it always technically correct to override the hashCode function
>> #like so:
>> #
>> # @Override
>> # public int hashCode() {
>> # return 1;
>> # }
>>
>> For which the answer is YES. Per documentation.
>>
>> But with really poor performance in many relevant cases.
>>
>> #Would it be potentially better if that was Object's implementation?
>>
>> Which was clarified to:
>>
>> #Better in the sense that you would never HAVE to override hashCode.
>>
>> For which the answer is also YES. Per the previous.
>
> No, that's not true. Value-equality maps, for example, would not work if
> you didn't override 'hashCode()' in the key type to match value equality
> on the keys.
That was almost exactly what I answered in my first answer to the original
poster.
Then I read it as "would it be better if my class used Object's
implementation".
But after reading the clarification then I think it should be read as "would it
be better if Object used the implementation shown".
Very different question!
Arne
-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
+ Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: hashCode "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000 Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <������ høj@1:261/38.remove-odu-this> - 2012-08-13 19:38 +0000 Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <������ høj@1:261/38.remove-odu-this> - 2012-08-13 19:38 +0000
csiph-web