Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #17752
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!news-out.news.tds.net!newsreading01.news.tds.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Arne Vajhøj" <������ høj@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> |
| Subject | Re: hashCode |
| Message-ID | <5027F2CA.56696.calajapr@time.synchro.net> (permalink) |
| X-Comment-To | Eric Sosman |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| In-Reply-To | <5027F2CA.56695.calajapr@time.synchro.net> |
| References | <5027F2CA.56695.calajapr@time.synchro.net> |
| X-FTN-AREA | COMP.LANG.JAVA.PROGRAMMER |
| X-FTN-MSGID | 1:261/38 044aca2d |
| X-FTN-REPLY | 1:261/38 57fbd16a |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=IBM437 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Gateway | time.synchro.net [Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98] |
| Lines | 45 |
| Date | Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:58:18 GMT |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 69.21.70.65 |
| X-Complaints-To | news@tds.net |
| X-Trace | newsreading01.news.tds.net 1344797898 69.21.70.65 (Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:58:18 CDT) |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 12 Aug 2012 13:58:18 CDT |
| Organization | tds.net |
| X-Received-Bytes | 2520 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:17752 |
Show key headers only | View raw
To: Eric Sosman
From: =?UTF-8?B?QXJuZSBWYWpow7hq?= <arne@vajhoej.dk>
On 8/11/2012 10:43 PM, Eric Sosman wrote:
> The O.P. asked whether it would "be potentially better" if
> Object's hashCode() returned a constant. He did *not* ask whether
> such an implementation would be correct; he only asked if it would
> "be potentially better." Upon prompting he explained what he
> meant by "better," and in light of that explanation the answer
> to his original question is NO. Discussions about "Oh, but it's
> CORRECT" are just red herrings; it's still not "better."
The original questions were:
#Is it always technically correct to override the hashCode function
#like so:
#
# @Override
# public int hashCode() {
# return 1;
# }
For which the answer is YES. Per documentation.
But with really poor performance in many relevant cases.
#Would it be potentially better if that was Object's implementation?
Which was clarified to:
#Better in the sense that you would never HAVE to override hashCode.
For which the answer is also YES. Per the previous.
But with the same performance note. And a big sigh because it seems to want to
broaden bad performance from a single class to the entire programming style
(multiple classes).
Arne
--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
hashCode "bob smith" <bob.smith@1:261/38.remove-t9h-this> - 2012-08-10 18:39 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-t9h-this> - 2012-08-10 18:39 +0000
Re: hashCode "markspace" <markspace@1:261/38.remove-t9h-this> - 2012-08-10 18:39 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-t9h-this> - 2012-08-10 18:39 +0000
Re: hashCode "rossum" <rossum@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Eric Sosman" <eric.sosman@1:261/38.remove-t9h-this> - 2012-08-10 18:39 +0000
Re: hashCode "bob smith" <bob.smith@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <������
høj@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <������
høj@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Eric Sosman" <eric.sosman@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <������
høj@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Eric Sosman" <eric.sosman@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <������
høj@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Robert Klemme" <robert.klemme@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
Re: hashCode "Robert Klemme" <robert.klemme@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-fzq-this> - 2012-08-20 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-fzq-this> - 2012-08-20 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Joshua Cranmer" <joshua.cranmer@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Eric Sosman" <eric.sosman@1:261/38.remove-6fd-this> - 2012-08-12 20:00 +0000
Re: hashCode "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-6fd-this> - 2012-08-12 20:00 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <������
høj@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
Re: hashCode "Jan Burse" <jan.burse@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Roedy Green" <roedy.green@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Roedy Green" <roedy.green@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Joerg Meier" <joerg.meier@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Mike Winter" <mike.winter@1:261/38.remove-ya-this> - 2012-08-11 19:19 +0000
Re: hashCode "Peter Duniho" <peter.duniho@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Jan Burse" <jan.burse@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "rossum" <rossum@1:261/38.remove-ya-this> - 2012-08-11 19:19 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Eric Sosman" <eric.sosman@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Jan Burse" <jan.burse@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Jan Burse" <jan.burse@1:261/38.remove-pjg-this> - 2012-08-11 18:17 +0000
Re: hashCode "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <������
høj@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Jan Burse" <jan.burse@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Jan Burse" <jan.burse@1:261/38.remove-m2z-this> - 2012-08-12 18:58 +0000
Re: hashCode "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-6fd-this> - 2012-08-12 20:00 +0000
Re: hashCode "Arne Vajhøj" <������
høj@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
csiph-web