Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #17182
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-in-01.newsfeed.easynews.com!easynews.com!easynews!news-out.news.tds.net!newsreading01.news.tds.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "Eric Sosman" <eric.sosman@1:261/38.remove-gby-this> |
| Subject | Re: multiple inheritance |
| Message-ID | <501D725E.56141.calajapr@time.synchro.net> (permalink) |
| X-Comment-To | bob smith |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| In-Reply-To | <501D725E.56140.calajapr@time.synchro.net> |
| References | <501D725E.56140.calajapr@time.synchro.net> |
| X-FTN-AREA | COMP.LANG.JAVA.PROGRAMMER |
| X-FTN-MSGID | 1:261/38 cc9a6619 |
| X-FTN-REPLY | 1:261/38 23fcc54e |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=IBM437 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Gateway | time.synchro.net [Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98] |
| Lines | 50 |
| Date | Sat, 04 Aug 2012 19:43:55 GMT |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 69.21.70.65 |
| X-Complaints-To | news@tds.net |
| X-Trace | newsreading01.news.tds.net 1344109435 69.21.70.65 (Sat, 04 Aug 2012 14:43:55 CDT) |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sat, 04 Aug 2012 14:43:55 CDT |
| Organization | tds.net |
| X-Received-Bytes | 2570 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:17182 |
Show key headers only | View raw
To: bob smith
From: "Eric Sosman" <eric.sosman@1:261/38.remove-5qr-this>
To: bob smith
From: "Eric Sosman" <eric.sosman@1:261/38.remove-yy0-this>
To: bob smith
From: "Eric Sosman" <eric.sosman@1:261/38.remove-s5y-this>
To: bob smith
From: Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid>
On 8/1/2012 10:28 PM, bob smith wrote:
> Why doesn't Java support multiple inheritance?
To discourage formation of a Kennefeller dynasty?
Because diamonds are a girl's best friend but a programmer's
biggest headache?
The web is full of pages discussing the pros and cons of
Java's choice. Perhaps you should read a few of them and then (if so moved)
post "Excuse E for omitting multiple inheritance seems unconvincing to me for
reasons R1 and R2, despite supporting arguments S1 through S9. Here's a
concrete example where I think R1 and R2 trump S* and overturn E; what do
others think?"
--
Eric Sosman
esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid
-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
+ Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
+ Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
+ Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
multiple inheritance "bob smith" <bob.smith@1:261/38.remove-gby-this> - 2012-08-04 19:43 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Eric Sosman" <eric.sosman@1:261/38.remove-gby-this> - 2012-08-04 19:43 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "markspace" <markspace@1:261/38.remove-gby-this> - 2012-08-04 19:43 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-gby-this> - 2012-08-04 19:43 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Joshua Cranmer" <joshua.cranmer@1:261/38.remove-gby-this> - 2012-08-04 19:43 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-gby-this> - 2012-08-04 19:43 +0000
csiph-web