Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #16710

Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML??

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!news-out.readnews.com!transit3.readnews.com!news-out.news.tds.net!newsreading01.news.tds.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-dpk-this>
Subject Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML??
Message-ID <50181D57.55678.calajapr@time.synchro.net> (permalink)
X-Comment-To Lars Enderin
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
In-Reply-To <50181D55.55676.calajapr@time.synchro.net>
References <50181D55.55676.calajapr@time.synchro.net>
X-FTN-AREA COMP.LANG.JAVA.PROGRAMMER
X-FTN-MSGID 1:261/38 a56d6977
X-FTN-REPLY 1:261/38 3cd0fd6d
Content-Type text/plain; charset=IBM437
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Gateway time.synchro.net [Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98]
Lines 54
Date Tue, 31 Jul 2012 18:02:18 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host 69.21.70.65
X-Complaints-To news@tds.net
X-Trace newsreading01.news.tds.net 1343757738 69.21.70.65 (Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:02:18 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date Tue, 31 Jul 2012 13:02:18 CDT
Organization tds.net
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:16710

Show key headers only | View raw


  To: Lars Enderin
From: "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-rf4-this>

  To: Lars Enderin
From: "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-pvc-this>

  To: Lars Enderin
From: "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-5bm-this>

  To: Lars Enderin
From: Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org>

On 7/28/2012 1:03 PM, Lars Enderin wrote:
> 2012-07-28 21:51, kensi skrev:
...
>> Please switch back to your original providers, or if you can't for some
>> reason, such as because they closed, please find something better than
>> TDS to replace them with. AIOE works well enough for me and does not
>> break References: when I reply or screw up encoding the o character. It
>> does not require signup. Eternal-September is something I often see
>> recommended, does require signup, but is free. Either of those is
>> probably better than (and maybe even cheaper than) this TDS, from all
>> indications.
>
> I, for one, did not switch to that provider, yet my last post,
> addressing the same point as yours, got copied through it. I don't think
> anybody else chose it either. The posts are copied with different
> headers but the same contents. That server should be closed down.
>

Same here. I've used west.news.earthlink.net at my NNTP server for many years. 
I've just checked some messages, and recent ones have corrupted headers.

Patricia

-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 + Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 + Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

-+- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 + Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
-+- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
 * Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Lars Enderin" <lars.enderin@1:261/38.remove-dpk-this> - 2012-07-31 18:02 +0000
  Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Patricia Shanahan" <patricia.shanahan@1:261/38.remove-dpk-this> - 2012-07-31 18:02 +0000
    Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "David Lamb" <david.lamb@1:261/38.remove-dpk-this> - 2012-07-31 18:02 +0000
      Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Robert Klemme" <robert.klemme@1:261/38.remove-dpk-this> - 2012-07-31 18:02 +0000
        Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML?? "Robert Klemme" <robert.klemme@1:261/38.remove-dpk-this> - 2012-07-31 18:02 +0000

csiph-web