Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #12507
| Date | 2012-02-28 17:20 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Additional logging questions |
| References | (1 earlier) <4f4ae583$0$281$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <XnsA005ED51BFCF7jpnasty@94.75.214.39> <jif6ua$3cm$1@news.albasani.net> <4f4c31bc$0$290$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <B6GdnQm7Q-5HGtHSnZ2dnUVZ8qidnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Message-ID | <4f4d534d$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink) |
| Organization | SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source |
On 2/28/2012 2:52 AM, Leif Roar Moldskred wrote: > Arne Vajhøj<arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote: > >> Warning and above may be ops relevant, but the lower levels and >> that is typical the majority of log messages are for developers. > > That's one idea I miss in the Java logging idiom: that there are > different types of logs that are kept for different purposes and that > a log message might be relevant for only one or some of these log > types. > > That the system can't create a temporary file because there's not > enough available disk space is of vital importance in an operations > log, but completely irrelevant to an audit-trail log and of lesser > importance to an error-tracking / debugging support log. > > While it's trivial to implement logging to do this, as the idea hasn't > taken hold in the Java culture it's hardly ever done, which is a pity. I think the split out of ops relevant data is typical done via the ops monitoring software (IBM Tivoli, CA Unicenter or whatever). Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Additional logging questions Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-02-27 02:02 +0000
Re: Additional logging questions Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-26 21:08 -0500
Re: Additional logging questions Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-02-27 04:12 +0000
Re: Additional logging questions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-02-26 22:13 -0800
Re: Additional logging questions Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-02-27 19:14 +0000
Re: Additional logging questions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-02-27 12:32 -0800
Re: Additional logging questions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-02-27 13:06 -0800
Re: Additional logging questions Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-02-28 01:48 +0000
Re: Additional logging questions Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-27 20:57 -0500
Re: Additional logging questions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-02-27 23:51 -0800
Re: Additional logging questions Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-27 20:50 -0500
Re: Additional logging questions Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-02-27 23:57 -0800
Re: Additional logging questions Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-27 20:45 -0500
Re: Additional logging questions Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-02-28 01:52 -0600
Re: Additional logging questions Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-28 17:20 -0500
Re: Additional logging questions Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-02-28 20:26 -0400
Re: Additional logging questions Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-27 20:34 -0500
Re: Additional logging questions Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-27 12:36 -0800
Re: Additional logging questions Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-02-28 01:43 +0000
csiph-web