Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11744
| Date | 2012-02-04 18:29 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Interplatform (interprocess, interlanguage) communication |
| References | <IPC-20120203200443@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <jgjnjq$qsm$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <4f2dbf48$0$290$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink) |
| Organization | SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source |
On 2/4/2012 11:50 AM, Jeffrey H. Coffield wrote: > On 02/03/2012 11:52 AM, Stefan Ram wrote: >> Sockets >> >> This is slightly less transparent than files, but has the >> advantage that it becomes very easy to have the two >> processes running on different computers later, if this >> should ever be required. Debugging should be possible >> by a man-in-the-middle proxy that prints all information >> it sees or by connecting to the server with a terminal. > > SOAP has been mentioned, but I would also look at REST. An http post > with an XML response although less powerful, has a wider range of > support. Using port 80/443 to get to a server also greatly simplifies > firewall issues when the systems are remote. That is given by the HTTP transport more than the RPC style SOAP vs RESTful POX. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Interplatform (interprocess, interlanguage) communication "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2012-02-04 08:50 -0800 Re: Interplatform (interprocess, interlanguage) communication Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-04 18:29 -0500
csiph-web