Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8870

Re: Getter performance

Show all headers | View raw

On 15-10-11 23:03, schreef Aéris:
> Hello everybody.
>
> I work on an application where performances are important.
>
> To optimize it, I thought a direct access to a variable (foo.bar) would
> be more efficient than a getter call (foo.getBar()).
> I thought by avoiding the call to a method and all that goes with it
> (context switching, stacking, return value…), I can save time, but this
> code sample prove the contrary :
> 	http://pastebin.com/bP1nqxce
> 	Direct variable access : 1041 ms
> 	Getter call : 556 ms
>
> The difference is even more important if I don't modify the variable
> value (lines 29 and 36 commented) :
> 	Direct variable access : 95 ms
> 	Getter call : 4 ms
>
> How can we explain this not obvious huge difference ( 50 and 95% ) ?
>

You forgot the JIT compiler. All the nice clean code you have written is 
optimized by the compiler. You don't write C code, remember.
Why is Java so fast: it uses the JIT compiler which optimizes the code 
for the machine the program is running on.
if you write
   int a = myObject.getA();

the compiler compiles it probably as:
   int a = myObject.a;

There is also a change that you try to optimize your code and the JIT 
compiler does not now how to optimize it, so your code runs slower.

Jaap

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Getter performance Aéris <aeris@imirhil.fr> - 2011-10-15 23:03 +0200
  Re: Getter performance Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-10-15 17:36 -0400
    Re: Getter performance Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-10-15 17:42 -0400
      Re: Getter performance BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-15 15:00 -0700
        Re: Getter performance markspace <-@.> - 2011-10-15 15:20 -0700
          Re: Getter performance David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-10-20 12:45 -0400
            Re: Getter performance Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-21 14:27 -0700
              Re: Getter performance Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-10-21 18:57 -0700
                Re: Getter performance Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-10-22 07:27 +0100
                Re: Getter performance Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-10-22 09:57 -0300
              Re: Getter performance Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-10-21 22:12 -0400
    Re: Getter performance Aéris <aeris@imirhil.fr> - 2011-10-15 23:59 +0200
      Re: Getter performance Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-10-15 19:44 -0400
        Re: Getter performance Aéris <aeris@imirhil.fr> - 2011-10-16 13:14 +0200
          Re: Getter performance Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2011-10-16 16:28 +0200
  Re: Getter performance Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-10-16 09:47 -0400
  Re: Getter performance Jaap Droogers <JaapDroogers@unusable.meel.homelinux.net> - 2011-10-16 22:12 +0200
    Re: Getter performance BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-16 13:58 -0700
    Re: Getter performance David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-10-20 12:51 -0400
      Re: Getter performance Paul Cager <paul.cager@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-21 08:49 -0700
  Re: Getter performance Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-21 08:02 -0700
  Re: Getter performance Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-22 21:11 +0200

csiph-web