Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6946
| Date | 2011-08-09 22:37 -0400 |
|---|---|
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Getters and Setters |
| References | <79c811c0-8eec-4c87-8027-2bc971818278@l9g2000prd.googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <4e41eed9$0$306$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink) |
| Organization | SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source |
On 8/9/2011 9:59 PM, Vikram wrote: > Why do we use getter and setters if we can do the same work by > declaring the public data members. I would say that argument #1 is that additional functionality to the getters and setters can be added later without changes to the calling code and argument #2 is that getters and setters are polymorphic which fields are not. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Getters and Setters Vikram <vpradhan33@gmail.com> - 2011-08-09 18:59 -0700
Re: Getters and Setters "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-08-09 22:11 -0400
Re: Getters and Setters Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-09 22:37 -0400
Re: Getters and Setters Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-09 23:30 -0400
Re: Getters and Setters Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-10 06:34 -0300
Re: Getters and Setters Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-08-09 21:50 -0700
csiph-web