Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6469

Re: JavaBeans

Date	2011-07-23 13:29 -0400
From	Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: JavaBeans
References	<Java-Beans-20110723141119@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <4e2aefdd$0$307$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <NET-20110723181206@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
Message-ID	<4e2b04ec$0$310$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink)
Organization	SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/23/2011 12:12 PM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> Arne Vajhøj<arne@vajhoej.dk>  writes:
>> If you want this type of stuff then VB6 ->  C# win forms ->  C# WPF
>> has simply been the typical choices.
>
>    But then:
>
>        »The fear of .NET developers is that Microsoft's Windows
>        team now regards not only Silverlight but also .NET as a
>        legacy technology.«
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/06/06/windows_tablets_without_silverlight_dot_net/

I think that article is too much tabloid style.

If MS put out a newer GUI framework using HTML5/CSS/JS then it may make
XAML legacy it will not make .NET in general legacy.

I doubt that even MS at this time knows really what they will do. But 
eventually they will make a decision.

And maybe the above will then become
    VB6 ->  C# win forms ->  C# WPF -> C# XYZ
or
    VB6 ->  C# win forms ->  C# WPF -> ABC XYZ

Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: JavaBeans Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 11:59 -0400
  [Semi-OT] Unplanned Obsolescence (was Re: JavaBeans) Travers Naran <tnaran@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 09:50 -0700
  Re: JavaBeans Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 13:29 -0400

csiph-web