Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6457

Re: JavaBeans

Date	2011-07-23 12:01 -0400
From	Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: JavaBeans
References	<Java-Beans-20110723141119@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <j0eoil$vjg$1@dont-email.me> <Beans-20110723172255@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <j0eqc7$c2h$1@dont-email.me> <28db19fd-7ed4-430b-9474-bc41bee7350d@v11g2000prn.googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<4e2af05c$0$307$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink)
Organization	SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/23/2011 11:55 AM, lewbloch wrote:
> And as others have observed, they are used.  In fact, the nearly-
> universal convention of using get/set methods for properties makes
> those classes that do that JavaBeans by definition.  How is that a
> "failure"?

JavaBeans in the sense of data classes with getters and setters
are certainly a success, but I don't think the original poster
is talking about that.

Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: JavaBeans markspace <-@.> - 2011-07-23 08:15 -0700
  Re: JavaBeans Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-07-23 17:36 +0200
  Re: JavaBeans markspace <-@.> - 2011-07-23 08:46 -0700
    Re: JavaBeans lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 08:55 -0700
      Re: JavaBeans Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-23 12:01 -0400
        Re: JavaBeans lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-23 09:50 -0700
      Re: JavaBeans Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-07-25 13:01 +0100

csiph-web