Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6399
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Date | Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:19:18 -0400 |
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Why "lock" functionality is introduced for all the objects? |
| References | <d0bb9e06-16f0-4282-a37e-47e9ca9630ec@r2g2000vbj.googlegroups.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1106302251380.3024@urchin.earth.li> <4e28c4c4$0$308$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <j0auu8$3cm$1@Gaia.teknon.de> |
| In-Reply-To | <j0auu8$3cm$1@Gaia.teknon.de> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Lines | 14 |
| Message-ID | <4e2986ea$0$315$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink) |
| Organization | SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 72.192.23.157 |
| X-Trace | news.sunsite.dk DXC=[7H[NZkD`VVU2<R_[OZ4CYYSB=nbEKnk[4ang]8e?CoPJPe3\kP5EUQKBm9cfh9BSTM2;kT<[:>[Q\``R3S_F;3WPTIYKm:f0__ |
| X-Complaints-To | staff@sunsite.dk |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6399 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 7/22/2011 12:39 AM, Volker Borchert wrote: > Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> Given that Java does not allow multiple inheritance > > ..which is about the most annoying omission... Well - SUN did not think so and when MS had to do .NET and C# they did not think so. Sure SUN and MS could be wrong, but there must be some merit to omitting it. Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: Why "lock" functionality is introduced for all the objects? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-21 20:30 -0400
Re: Why "lock" functionality is introduced for all the objects? Henderson <h1@g1.f1> - 2011-07-22 00:20 -0400
Re: Why "lock" functionality is introduced for all the objects? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-22 10:17 -0400
Re: Why "lock" functionality is introduced for all the objects? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-22 09:30 -0700
Re: Why "lock" functionality is introduced for all the objects? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-07-22 09:45 -0700
Re: Why "lock" functionality is introduced for all the objects? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-22 14:53 -0400
Re: Why "lock" functionality is introduced for all the objects? v_borchert@despammed.com (Volker Borchert) - 2011-07-22 04:39 +0000
Re: Why "lock" functionality is introduced for all the objects? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-22 10:19 -0400
csiph-web