Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:19:18 -0400 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arne_Vajh=F8j?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Why "lock" functionality is introduced for all the objects? References: <4e28c4c4$0$308$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 14 Message-ID: <4e2986ea$0$315$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Organization: SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.192.23.157 X-Trace: news.sunsite.dk DXC=[7H[NZkD`VVU2[Q\``R3S_F;3WPTIYKm:f0__ X-Complaints-To: staff@sunsite.dk Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6399 On 7/22/2011 12:39 AM, Volker Borchert wrote: > Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> Given that Java does not allow multiple inheritance > > ..which is about the most annoying omission... Well - SUN did not think so and when MS had to do .NET and C# they did not think so. Sure SUN and MS could be wrong, but there must be some merit to omitting it. Arne