Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26059
| Date | 2011-01-29 13:12 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: negative regexes. |
| References | <cbeaaf3f-66e1-4ef8-a45b-414e7bc43712@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <4d3f7c8c$0$23760$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <ihpe47$j46$1@online.de> <ihq5la$fnl$1@localhost.localdomain> |
| Message-ID | <4d4458a6$0$23759$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink) |
| Organization | SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source |
On 26-01-2011 17:02, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:20:44 +0100, Christian wrote:
>> I think the multiple levels of escapes are a problem even to people
>> accustomed to regexp.
>>
> Agreed.
>
>> At least I look twice when I have to match \\ in text this translates
>> in regexp to "\\\\\\\\" or alternatively "\\\\{2}" Both does not look
>> nice. Though I don't know how it should be done better. Maybe if Regexp
>> like SQL in .NET would get some language support.
>>
> Just using something like the Python notation would help a lot.
>
> In Python that regex could written as r'\\{2}' or r'\\\\' - IMO the first
> form is the most readable.
Same as C# - it just use @ instead of r.
Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: negative regexes. Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-01-29 13:12 -0500
csiph-web