Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3354
| From | byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | A question about synchronized threads |
| Date | Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:35:09 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Lines | 19 |
| Message-ID | <3f249d87-aaf8-4732-9ee8-fd112cf82553@f31g2000pri.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 203.252.106.182 |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-Trace | posting.google.com 1304091310 9613 127.0.0.1 (29 Apr 2011 15:35:10 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:35:10 +0000 (UTC) |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | f31g2000pri.googlegroups.com; posting-host=203.252.106.182; posting-account=v_GC8QoAAABz34PprEBWdejdnnHZvg4_ |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-HTTP-UserAgent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.60 Safari/534.24,gzip(gfe) |
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.stben.net!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!postnews.google.com!f31g2000pri.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:3354 |
Show key headers only | View raw
public class A {
synchronized void m1() { ... }
synchronized void m2() { ... }
void m3() { ... }
}
The book explains above code:
Given an instance a of class A, when one thread is executing
a.m1(),
another thread will be prohibited from executing a.m1() or a.m2().
I have a question.
The explanation means than when one thread is executing m1() method,
No other threads can execute m1() or m2() thread.
Is it correct? If it is correct, how can I handle it better?
I think it is too ineffectual. Does anybody know?
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
A question about synchronized threads byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 08:35 -0700
Re: A question about synchronized threads Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-29 11:53 -0400
Re: A question about synchronized threads byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 09:12 -0700
Re: A question about synchronized threads Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-04-29 21:01 -0400
Re: A question about synchronized threads byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 18:43 -0700
Re: A question about synchronized threads Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-29 17:58 +0200
Re: A question about synchronized threads byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 09:09 -0700
Re: A question about synchronized threads markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-29 11:11 -0700
Re: A question about synchronized threads Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-29 20:19 +0200
Re: A question about synchronized threads markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-29 15:21 -0700
Re: A question about synchronized threads Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-04-29 21:10 -0700
Re: A question about synchronized threads dagon@dagon.net (Dagon) - 2011-04-29 15:55 -0700
Re: A question about synchronized threads Alice <quaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-04-29 20:08 -0400
Re: A question about synchronized threads markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-29 19:07 -0700
Re: A question about synchronized threads byhesed <byhesed@gmail.com> - 2011-04-29 18:49 -0700
Re: A question about synchronized threads Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-03 18:57 -0400
Re: A question about synchronized threads Deeyana <d.awlberg@hotmail.invalid> - 2011-05-04 00:17 +0000
Re: A question about synchronized threads Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-04 12:45 -0400
Re: A question about synchronized threads Deeyana <d.awlberg@hotmail.invalid> - 2011-05-04 19:59 +0000
csiph-web