Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #7120

Re: Synchronization of the constructor

From	"Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
References	(1 earlier) <j25uri$vm$1@dont-email.me> <j264b6$3u5$1@dont-email.me> <fb83dde2-63a4-4990-b8f9-af413301c31d@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <SuadncmuyIkvM9vTnZ2dnUVZ_rydnZ2d@earthlink.com> <e695c538-923e-41c7-9345-659ca2e4e9ab@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com>
Subject	Re: Synchronization of the constructor
Date	2011-08-15 14:24 +1000
Message-ID	<34adnbSkXNNkAtXTnZ2dnUVZ_umdnZ2d@westnet.com.au> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

"Lew"  wrote in message 
news:e695c538-923e-41c7-9345-659ca2e4e9ab@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com...

[snip]

> Point being that there are particular use cases when it's OK to use a 
> constructor if the advantages of a factory method are not particularly 
> compelling, or if the hoops to implement and > use a factory method are 
> too epicyclic.  But Patricia's advice and insights are very sound (as they 
> always are from her); factory methods bring great advantages for a lot of 
> scenarios.  I > certainly plan to increase my appreciation for them 
> because of her post.

In general is it better to have static factory methods on the class that is 
to be instantiated or to have a separate factory class?

And loving it,

-Qu0ll (Rare, not extinct)
_________________________________________________
Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com
[Replace the "SixFour" with numbers to email me]

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Synchronization of the constructor MaciekL <__nospam__maclab@o2.pl> - 2011-08-13 11:58 +0200
  Re: Synchronization of the constructor Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-08-13 12:17 +0200
    Re: Synchronization of the constructor "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-08-13 21:36 +1000
      Re: Synchronization of the constructor Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-08-13 09:30 -0300
    [OT] Natural language. Was: Re: Synchronization of the constructor Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-13 07:10 -0700
  Re: Synchronization of the constructor Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-13 09:36 -0400
    Re: Synchronization of the constructor markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-13 08:13 -0700
      Re: Synchronization of the constructor Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-13 09:23 -0700
        Re: Synchronization of the constructor Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-13 10:04 -0700
          Re: Synchronization of the constructor Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-13 21:29 -0700
            Re: Synchronization of the constructor kedar mhaswade <kedar.mhaswade@gmail.com> - 2011-08-13 23:16 -0700
            Re: Synchronization of the constructor "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-08-15 14:24 +1000
              Re: Synchronization of the constructor Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-14 23:03 -0700
      Re: Synchronization of the constructor kedar mhaswade <kedar.mhaswade@gmail.com> - 2011-08-13 23:12 -0700
        Re: Synchronization of the constructor markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-14 07:42 -0700
          Re: Synchronization of the constructor markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-14 07:51 -0700
            Re: Synchronization of the constructor Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-08-14 09:10 -0700
              Re: Synchronization of the constructor markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-14 11:28 -0700

csiph-web