Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3619
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: O/T: Awesome vocabulary (Was: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets?) |
| Date | Thu, 05 May 2011 17:02:34 -0600 |
| Organization | As little as possible |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <2p39kspx85.fsf@shell.xmission.com> (permalink) |
| References | <ba0c3c4d-cf9e-4b1b-82a8-30b84405b915@17g2000prr.googlegroups.com> <h%kwp.57959$0s5.42695@newsfe17.iad> <nospam-85654B.12160105052011@news.aioe.org> <ipun5u$2v1$1@dont-email.me> <nospam-A3001A.17200805052011@news.aioe.org> <ipv4q1$pbe$4@news.albasani.net> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105052330520.11808@urchin.earth.li> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Injection-Info | mx01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="dZdavj/jUDynNQgDq5jkeA"; logging-data="32286"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/RVGGDYpajIPbsSH/GOBUP" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:BRbd7ooJ7P514dyh8m6gvUp8joc= sha1:FxlMD4Jrm4vTTs+/jKoNdWXCMu4= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:3619 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> writes: > On Thu, 5 May 2011, Lew wrote: > >> John B. Matthews wrote: >>> Related bugs are notoriously protean and difficult to reproduce; >> ^^^^^^^ >>> diligence is the only defense. >> >> Awesome vocabulary! > > See also: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amoeba_proteus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Proteus_Steinmetz -- Jim Janney
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? steveh44 <steve_h44@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-04 14:34 -0700
Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-05-04 16:07 -0700
Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-05 12:16 -0400
Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? markspace <-@.> - 2011-05-05 10:35 -0700
Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-05 17:20 -0400
O/T: Awesome vocabulary (Was: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets?) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-05 17:28 -0400
Re: O/T: Awesome vocabulary (Was: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets?) Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-05-05 23:31 +0100
Re: O/T: Awesome vocabulary (Was: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets?) Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-05-05 17:02 -0600
Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? markspace <-@.> - 2011-05-05 20:05 -0700
Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-04 19:10 -0400
Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-05 16:47 -0700
Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Andrew Thompson <andrewthommo@gmail.com> - 2011-05-06 03:25 -0700
Re: should I use java.awt.* only or also use javax.swing in applets? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-06 19:06 +0200
csiph-web