Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10198
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers |
| Date | 2011-11-23 14:52 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <25uqc7pq26utgv2ocni72outlqulk36u63@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <jaes5h$8bo$1@dont-email.me> <26839074.317.1321974960424.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prdy11> <jaheje$34l$1@dont-email.me> <18687925.6.1322080680734.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prez7> |
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:38:00 -0800 (PST), Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com>
wrote:
>Jeffrey H. Coffield wrote:
>> Lew wrote:
>>> Which annotations did you have in mind? Certainly '@Entity' and '@EntityManager' will work with multiple persistence units. Of course, annotations like '@OneToMany' will not, AFAIK, since they map to foreign-key relationships in the DBMS.
>>>
>> I had in mind specifically the annotation in the subject. OneToOne. With
>> that, I think I could get the rest to work or understand the problems
>> better.
>
>Don't leave things just in the subject line. That isn't part of the query.
>
>Always put enough in the _body_ of your post.
>
>All too often on Usenet, the subject line turns out not to relate very well
with the content of the post. The convention therefore is to make
the body self-sufficient. You did not do that.
It does not matter if the subject line is relevant. Often,
people do not read it. Consider a post with subject
Possible Compiler Bug with Foo 1.2.3
and the version is not mentioned in the post body. Quite often, you
will see a reply asking which version of Foo is being used.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2011-11-21 16:59 -0800
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-11-22 07:02 -0800
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-22 07:16 -0800
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers jlp <jlp@jlp.com> - 2011-11-22 19:14 +0100
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2011-11-22 16:26 -0800
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2011-11-22 18:34 -0800
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-11-23 07:32 -0400
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-25 21:41 -0500
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2011-11-27 16:07 -0800
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-11-28 06:42 -0400
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-23 12:38 -0800
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-11-23 14:52 -0800
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-25 21:37 -0500
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-11-26 21:22 -0800
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-12-02 21:03 -0500
Re: JPA OneToOne annotation across two different jdbc drivers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-25 21:38 -0500
csiph-web