Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #2569

Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++)

From	"tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.os.os2.advocacy, comp.text.tex
Subject	Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++)
Followup-To	alt.test
Date	2011-03-29 16:59 -0700
Organization	http://groups.google.com
Message-ID	<24a29504-fd59-4314-9a98-00802f521a0a@18g2000prd.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <8b37aa42-23ab-44fc-936e-4098165b41c4@i35g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <3ba8a322-de33-41ed-83bc-4c1cc135c046@dn9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <f76b2040-4311-4185-ba7a-7cfe736023cf@k15g2000prk.googlegroups.com> <12c18271-1a9f-4f77-82f7-861a6bb9789a@o10g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> <im5s4t$pgn$1@news.eternal-september.org>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Followups directed to: alt.test

Show all headers | View raw

Howard DeVoe <hdevoe@umd.edu> writes:

1> Newsgroups:
comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.os.os2.advocacy,comp.text.tex

1> This entire thread is perfectly infantile!

What does your ironic infantile contribution have to
do with OS/2, DeVoe?

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-03-29 16:59 -0700
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Jerry Gerrone <scuzwalla@gmail.com> - 2011-03-29 18:44 -0700
    Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Steve <me@privacy.net> - 2011-03-30 12:24 +0100
    Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-03-30 04:42 -0700

csiph-web