Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10760
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case |
| Date | 2011-12-14 16:55 -0800 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <23351706.113.1323910551821.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@yqkb10> (permalink) |
| References | <8bbbbee3-adcc-4f28-aff5-2e230b047401@u6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com> <jcb49r$350$1@dont-email.me> <d80833f1-8be5-4535-8391-4db8c7d41a5e@c18g2000yqj.googlegroups.com> |
Saxo wrote:
>> When you change the shared AtomicBoolean, some threads executing
>> get() may have already observed the old value and may have decided
>> which value to return based on that now-outdated observation. So yes,
>> there's a race: It is possible for get() to return an old value after
>> the AtomicBoolean changes from true to false, or a new value after it
>> changes from false to true.
>
> Oh shit, of course! I have thought about it. First though was to call
>
> if(useNewValue.get()) {
> // ...
> }
>
> that often till it returns the same value. But useNewValue could
> change just thereafter. So you would have to call this infinitely
> often till you are sure you get the right value. Obviously, this
> doesn't work. Then I forgot about the issue.
>
> Thanks for the hint. Now I have to think how to solve this ...
Bearing in mind that you don't need, and shouldn't use, an 'AtomicBoolean' for
this in the first place.
--
Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Saxo <saxo123@gmx.de> - 2011-12-14 09:07 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-12-14 17:53 +0000
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-14 10:44 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-12-14 10:54 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-12-14 21:15 +0000
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-15 14:58 +0000
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Saxo <saxo123@gmx.de> - 2011-12-15 08:40 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-15 11:55 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-16 14:06 +0000
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2011-12-16 10:09 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Saxo <saxo123@gmx.de> - 2011-12-14 11:47 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-12-14 10:53 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Saxo <saxo123@gmx.de> - 2011-12-14 11:54 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-12-15 16:38 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Saxo <saxo123@gmx.de> - 2011-12-15 23:01 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-12-16 09:34 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Saxo <saxo123@gmx.de> - 2011-12-17 11:55 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Saxo <saxo123@gmx.de> - 2011-12-19 05:33 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-14 11:04 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Saxo <saxo123@gmx.de> - 2011-12-14 12:32 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case markspace <-@.> - 2011-12-14 14:13 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-12-14 17:44 -0500
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Saxo <saxo123@gmx.de> - 2011-12-14 14:50 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case markspace <-@.> - 2011-12-14 15:26 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-15 01:34 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-12-14 21:38 +0000
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-12-14 16:26 -0500
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Saxo <saxo123@gmx.de> - 2011-12-14 13:57 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-12-14 18:05 -0500
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Saxo <saxo123@gmx.de> - 2011-12-14 23:25 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Saxo <saxo123@gmx.de> - 2011-12-14 23:28 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-15 14:44 +0000
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-16 08:27 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-12-16 09:41 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-16 18:51 +0000
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-12-16 18:50 +0000
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Saxo <saxo123@gmx.de> - 2011-12-14 14:13 -0800
Re: Question whether a problem with race conditions exists in this case Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-14 16:55 -0800
csiph-web