Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10680

Re: When running Ant on command line, how to not-show its WARNING messages and only show ERROR message?

From	Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: When running Ant on command line, how to not-show its WARNING messages and only show ERROR message?
Date	2011-12-12 12:20 -0800
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<1doce7hdheo9ch1hs4ircu17hp5hu85l2h@4ax.com> (permalink)
References	<769dffa0-4077-4a3a-ad9a-57c5f5028cd8@l19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <lkk4e7ph9e2g63cfibf915fn7qfo644n1c@4ax.com> <8523a48b-1f30-4fd9-961c-6d2eb1ce61f7@q9g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> <8070867.1485.1323481647192.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prez15> <87q6e75arb1kit6pba8u79gcaq5cloiv47@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 06:14:11 -0800, Roedy Green
<see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> wrote:

>On Fri, 9 Dec 2011 17:47:27 -0800 (PST), Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com>
>wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
>
>>
>>Why do you think suppressing warnings is better than fixing your bugs?
>>
>>Why do you think it's acceptable to leave bugs in your code?
>
>Because generics are so squirrelly and hard to understand.
>
>Because, if he asks for help, he will get bawled out.
>
>Because, he has a deadline. The code works, so he figures it is ok to
>leave these warnings in place.
>
>Because he does not have the same desire for perfection that drives
>most computer programmers.

     Because if the code were wrong, the message would be an *error*
message.  A warning is just that it is possibly wrong.  This means
that it might well be correct.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Thread

csiph-web