Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6510
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!feeder.news-service.com!postnews.google.com!m18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas Lehmann <thomas.lehmann.private@googlemail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Getter/Setter - Serialization |
| Date | Sun, 24 Jul 2011 09:33:53 -0700 (PDT) |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Lines | 29 |
| Message-ID | <1aaf12f8-e9da-4767-8d40-36a585e13cfe@m18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <c591a234-aa23-4894-a693-e8b09756c934@15g2000vbw.googlegroups.com> <j0hdqs$mkh$1@dont-email.me> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 217.224.48.39 |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | quoted-printable |
| X-Trace | posting.google.com 1311525233 7763 127.0.0.1 (24 Jul 2011 16:33:53 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 24 Jul 2011 16:33:53 +0000 (UTC) |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | m18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com; posting-host=217.224.48.39; posting-account=9eyAowoAAADxZ2nqkXe_TQw63yeWUL6U |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| X-Google-Web-Client | true |
| X-Google-Header-Order | HUALESNKRC |
| X-HTTP-UserAgent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/5.0,gzip(gfe) |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6510 |
Show key headers only | View raw
The warning message comes with PMD (plugin). I'm intending to use XStream for XML serialization and so far I can see there is no need to provide getter and setter. I know that article (URL) but reading also "Effective Java" you will be warned about the problem with using "Serializable". On 24 Jul., 17:30, markspace <-@.> wrote: > On 7/24/2011 8:07 AM, Thomas Lehmann wrote: > > > I might have problems with the serialization then obviously requiring > > that the setter exists > > Yeah, I think the setter/getter might be required for XML style > serialization, but not in the general case. > > What are you doing that Eclipse says you need to mark a field as > transient? This doesn't make sense to me, because general serialization > will handle this just fine. I think I need some context here. > > Here's a good article on serialization: > > <http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Programming/serializa...>
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Getter/Setter - Serialization Thomas Lehmann <thomas.lehmann.private@googlemail.com> - 2011-07-24 08:07 -0700
Re: Getter/Setter - Serialization markspace <-@.> - 2011-07-24 08:30 -0700
Re: Getter/Setter - Serialization Thomas Lehmann <thomas.lehmann.private@googlemail.com> - 2011-07-24 09:33 -0700
Re: Getter/Setter - Serialization markspace <-@.> - 2011-07-24 10:26 -0700
Re: Getter/Setter - Serialization Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-07-24 20:35 -0400
Re: Getter/Setter - Serialization lewbloch <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-07-24 11:51 -0700
Re: Getter/Setter - Serialization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-07-25 00:47 -0700
csiph-web