Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #23487

Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure???

X-Received by 10.224.58.77 with SMTP id f13mr5532863qah.7.1366221256964; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received by 10.49.35.198 with SMTP id k6mr799176qej.18.1366221256908; Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!cj1no751714qab.0!news-out.google.com!ef9ni24qab.0!nntp.google.com!ca1no758601qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Date Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <5dntm85s55qmuh8cort7l0uuji2mpo9eav@4ax.com>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.94.213.9; posting-account=VsWLXwoAAAB13M2Ptt5-Bo-K_zCx-zyw
NNTP-Posting-Host 81.94.213.9
References <kkknq8$3u2$1@speranza.aioe.org> <5dntm85s55qmuh8cort7l0uuji2mpo9eav@4ax.com>
User-Agent G2/1.0
MIME-Version 1.0
Message-ID <1111e968-41af-460b-a065-898190221845@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure???
From paul.cager@gmail.com
Injection-Date Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:54:16 +0000
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:23487

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wednesday, 17 April 2013 18:37:00 UTC+1, Roedy Green  wrote:
> This makes no sense. A digitally signed Applet does dangerous things.
> 
> Unsigned ones do not.

I think the problem is that there have been bugs in Java's security model such that an unsigned applet could exploit a bug and do dangerous things.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

> Sandboxed power == More secure??? Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> - 2013-04-17 07:45 +0800
  Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-04-16 22:12 -0400
    Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-04-16 19:25 -0700
      Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-04-16 22:30 -0400
    Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-04-17 09:14 -0700
      Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-04-17 13:09 -0400
        Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-04-17 11:37 -0700
          Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-04-17 15:49 -0400
            Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-04-17 19:10 -0400
            Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-04-17 19:13 -0400
              Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-04-17 21:12 -0400
                Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-04-17 21:34 -0400
                Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-04-17 21:39 -0400
      Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-04-17 19:06 -0400
        Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-04-18 03:04 +0200
  Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-04-17 10:37 -0700
    Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? paul.cager@gmail.com - 2013-04-17 10:54 -0700
    Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-04-17 19:02 -0400
      Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Richard Maher <maher_rjSPAMLESS@hotmail.com> - 2013-04-25 10:09 +0800
        Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-04-24 22:30 -0400
        Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-04-25 08:54 -0700
          Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-04-26 22:11 -0400
            Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2013-04-26 20:05 -0700
              Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-04-27 22:23 -0400
              Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2013-04-28 12:09 +0100
                Re: > Sandboxed power == More secure??? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-04-28 09:43 -0400

csiph-web