Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #20920
| X-Received | by 10.224.72.199 with SMTP id n7mr27219273qaj.5.1357208000964; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:13:20 -0800 (PST) |
|---|---|
| Received | by 10.49.128.166 with SMTP id np6mr7801847qeb.31.1357208000845; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 02:13:20 -0800 (PST) |
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!ee4no12730099qab.0!news-out.google.com!k2ni4226qap.0!nntp.google.com!ee4no12852754qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Date | Thu, 3 Jan 2013 02:13:20 -0800 (PST) |
| In-Reply-To | <odmer9-onl.ln1@s.simpson148.btinternet.com> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=95.116.27.49; posting-account=QuOrbQoAAADk1Ytmd4kkfWK7_Nh1pnw_ |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 95.116.27.49 |
| References | <c885bedb-977c-49b4-a10a-b9cdd3df1dd9@googlegroups.com> <m0sdr9-0tg.ln1@s.simpson148.btinternet.com> <9f030e71-96ab-4ead-9690-4369f4a19aa9@googlegroups.com> <pk7er9-i4j.ln1@s.simpson148.btinternet.com> <d6fdb884-3181-4b37-a011-6da19e649758@googlegroups.com> <odmer9-onl.ln1@s.simpson148.btinternet.com> |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Message-ID | <0680c1e0-16cb-4791-8a5f-95a3ff2bcba8@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? |
| From | Saxo <jeti789@web.de> |
| Injection-Date | Thu, 03 Jan 2013 10:13:20 +0000 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| X-Received-Bytes | 1558 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:20920 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Am Mittwoch, 2. Januar 2013 22:46:00 UTC+1 schrieb Steven Simpson: > ints.stream().reduce(0, (x, y) -> x + y) This did it ;-). Thanks, good to know.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? jeti789@web.de - 2013-01-02 07:08 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? jeti789@web.de - 2013-01-02 07:52 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-02 17:33 +0000
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-02 11:31 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-02 12:52 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-02 20:58 -0400
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-02 17:40 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-01-03 20:43 -0400
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-02 23:44 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-01-03 07:57 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-03 13:22 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2013-01-03 16:14 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-02 21:46 +0000
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-01-02 17:35 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-03 02:13 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-03 06:45 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-04 21:32 +0000
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-01-04 14:38 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-04 23:45 +0000
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2013-01-04 17:24 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-05 13:20 +0000
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-05 01:50 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-05 11:21 +0000
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Saxo <jeti789@web.de> - 2013-01-05 04:27 -0800
Re: Why is that in JDK8: value used in lambda expression shuld be effectively final? Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2013-01-05 12:58 +0000
csiph-web