Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.help > #2057 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-08-22 19:57 -0700 |
| Last post | 2012-08-23 15:47 -0700 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.help
JavaFX on Windows needs CLASSPATH to find jfxrt.jar? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2012-08-22 19:57 -0700
Re: JavaFX on Windows needs CLASSPATH to find jfxrt.jar? markspace <-@.> - 2012-08-22 20:46 -0700
Re: JavaFX on Windows needs CLASSPATH to find jfxrt.jar? Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-08-23 01:30 -0400
Re: JavaFX on Windows needs CLASSPATH to find jfxrt.jar? Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2012-08-23 15:47 -0700
| From | Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-22 19:57 -0700 |
| Subject | JavaFX on Windows needs CLASSPATH to find jfxrt.jar? |
| Message-ID | <k1466k$qu6$1@dont-email.me> |
I just installed the new 1.7.0_06 with JavaFX 2.2. JavaFX is part of the JDK but after a regular install on Windows XP you still have to set the CLASSPATH to compile a program that uses the JavaFX API. Did I miss something or is that the way it is supposed to work? Thanks, -- Knute Johnson
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | markspace <-@.> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-22 20:46 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <k1493j$8kv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2057 |
On 8/22/2012 7:57 PM, Knute Johnson wrote: > I just installed the new 1.7.0_06 with JavaFX 2.2. JavaFX is part of > the JDK but after a regular install on Windows XP you still have to set > the CLASSPATH to compile a program that uses the JavaFX API. Did I miss > something or is that the way it is supposed to work? I think that's normal. I don't think it would be a good idea, in general, for the installer to add everything in the JDK to your regular path. Could mess stuff up good. I recall I normally have to tell my IDE that JavaFX is a library and point the IDE at the javafx.jar file manually for each project.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 01:30 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <k14f5n$vru$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2057 |
On 08/22/2012 10:57 PM, Knute Johnson wrote: > I just installed the new 1.7.0_06 with JavaFX 2.2. JavaFX is part of > the JDK but after a regular install on Windows XP you still have to set > the CLASSPATH to compile a program that uses the JavaFX API. Did I miss > something or is that the way it is supposed to work? > > Thanks, > Looks like with JavaSE9 that should not be necessary; <http://fxexperience.com/2012/08/javafx-2-2-is-here-and-javafx-8-0-is-on-its-way/>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-23 15:47 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <k16bu4$pnv$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #2057 |
On 8/22/2012 7:57 PM, Knute Johnson wrote: > I just installed the new 1.7.0_06 with JavaFX 2.2. JavaFX is part of > the JDK but after a regular install on Windows XP you still have to set > the CLASSPATH to compile a program that uses the JavaFX API. Did I miss > something or is that the way it is supposed to work? > > Thanks, > Thanks guys. -- Knute Johnson
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.help
csiph-web