Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.help > #698
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!news2.google.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 19 May 2011 09:35:09 -0500 |
| Date | Thu, 19 May 2011 07:35:08 -0700 |
| From | Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.help |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? |
| References | <8762p7upgn.fsf@merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRILUCA> <4t6Bp.534$pi2.511@newsfe11.iad> <ir30ui$jok$1@dont-email.me> |
| In-Reply-To | <ir30ui$jok$1@dont-email.me> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Message-ID | <veSdnZd_-OsAt0jQnZ2dnUVZ_oudnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink) |
| Lines | 29 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 75.8.126.96 |
| X-Trace | sv3-kVlsrEOadqSCbGJvjpB3uMpxkVQAdp5J0zrj8vW4ZLxHNbcxivMyqjeICDBB2NW1zbb/EVdS+kKEE0K!yMU9WFE3u39SKtySmI1DAa7YPMknWQ+bDKIRqjLQ1fo5OnSNyLR3rc/QxJ5gB6ajqWk3rjtrMp77!oUdDzHyl6HKFBnoV/EqHmpxgk4k5duulA4tA5oZeRlk= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2442 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.help:698 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 5/19/2011 5:03 AM, Eric Sosman wrote: > On 5/19/2011 6:40 AM, David Lamb wrote: >> [...] >> I think ++ exists only because the hardware on which C was developed had >> an addressing mode that did it atomically in the very special case of >> referring to >> something = array[index++]; > > FWIW, some guy named Dennis Ritchie says this is not true. > > "People often guess that [++ and --]were created to use the > auto-increment and auto-decrement address modes provided > by the DEC PDP-11 on which C and Unix first became popular. > This is historically impossible, since there was no PDP-11 > when B was developed." > > "B" is the language from which C inherited ++ and --, and much else. > There seem to me to be two reasons for the ++ and -- operators in C. Typing was slow and inconvenient when C was invented, so there was a motivation to make code terse. C made extensive use of macros that could represent expressions but not statements, so much was done as side effects. I do not understand why those operators exist in Java. They cannot be used without going against style advice in the JLS and Java is not a terse language. Patricia
Back to comp.lang.java.help | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Merciadri Luca <Luca.Merciadri@student.ulg.ac.be> - 2011-05-19 09:19 +0200
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Bent C Dalager <bcd@pvv.ntnu.no> - 2011-05-19 10:22 +0000
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-05-19 06:40 -0400
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-19 07:58 -0400
[OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-05-19 08:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-05-19 07:35 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-05-19 22:57 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2011-05-20 11:00 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-05-20 12:55 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-05-19 17:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-05-19 23:13 -0400
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-19 08:43 -0400
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-05-19 07:51 -0400
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-19 08:03 -0400
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-19 08:08 -0400
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-19 10:23 -0700
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Merciadri Luca <Luca.Merciadri@student.ulg.ac.be> - 2011-05-19 21:15 +0200
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-19 15:29 -0400
csiph-web