Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.help > #690
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!newsfeed1.swip.net!uio.no!ntnu.no!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Bent C Dalager <bcd@pvv.ntnu.no> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.help |
| Subject | Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? |
| Date | Thu, 19 May 2011 10:22:54 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | Norwegian university of science and technology |
| Lines | 25 |
| Message-ID | <slrnit9rru.v4e.bcd@microbel.pvv.ntnu.no> (permalink) |
| References | <8762p7upgn.fsf@merciadriluca-station.MERCIADRILUCA> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | microbel.pvv.ntnu.no |
| X-Trace | orkan.itea.ntnu.no 1305800574 21498 129.241.210.179 (19 May 2011 10:22:54 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | usenet@ntnu.no |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 19 May 2011 10:22:54 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | slrn/pre1.0.0-18 (Linux) |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.help:690 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2011-05-19, Merciadri Luca <Luca.Merciadri@student.ulg.ac.be> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've heard that it is generally better to use += 1 at the place of ++.
Could this be advice based on C++ experience rather than Java? In C++
I understand the two behave rather differently even if the result of
the calculation is often the same.
In particular "x++" may have some slight overhead issues in C++ in
that the compiler will need to keep a temporary copy of the original
state of "x" until the entire statement has been evaluated. I have
seen people advocate the use of "++x" in its stead for this reason,
when the difference otherwise doesn't matter.
In Java the only issue I can see is if you don't understand the
difference between ++x and x++, in which case you may want to use x += 1
until you have read up some more on the ++ operator.
Cheers,
Bent D
--
Bent Dalager - bcd@pvv.org - http://www.pvv.org/~bcd
powered by emacs
Back to comp.lang.java.help | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Merciadri Luca <Luca.Merciadri@student.ulg.ac.be> - 2011-05-19 09:19 +0200
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Bent C Dalager <bcd@pvv.ntnu.no> - 2011-05-19 10:22 +0000
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-05-19 06:40 -0400
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-19 07:58 -0400
[OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-05-19 08:03 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-05-19 07:35 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-05-19 22:57 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2011-05-20 11:00 +0100
Re: [OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-05-20 12:55 -0700
Re: [OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2011-05-19 17:58 -0400
Re: [OT] Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-05-19 23:13 -0400
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-19 08:43 -0400
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-05-19 07:51 -0400
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2011-05-19 08:03 -0400
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-19 08:08 -0400
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-05-19 10:23 -0700
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Merciadri Luca <Luca.Merciadri@student.ulg.ac.be> - 2011-05-19 21:15 +0200
Re: Why would one use += 1 at the place of ++? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-19 15:29 -0400
csiph-web