Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.help > #1462

Re: Work around requested

From "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.help
Subject Re: Work around requested
Date 2011-12-20 20:13 -0500
Organization The Wasteland
Message-ID <nospam-51D024.20134520122011@news.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <b887a9d5-a48b-409a-aee1-b1c95397506c@y7g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <17844998.127.1324178380897.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pril5> <nospam-92C1F7.01364918122011@news.aioe.org> <a400090b-3fe9-4395-9435-75f0754bca78@h3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <4decc207-ebaa-4d1c-9952-b73f18817f08@k10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


In article 
<4decc207-ebaa-4d1c-9952-b73f18817f08@k10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
 bH <bherbst65@hotmail.com> wrote:

> I compared the output using one large image
> 1600 x 1200 pixels cropped to 200 x 150 in both
> programs, first program uses:
> com.sun.image.codec.jpeg.JPEGCodec
> and the second program with the revision as suggested
> above by John Matthews:
> uses the classes javax.imageio.ImageIO and
> java.awt.image.AffineTransformOp.
> 
> The comparison result is that the suggested
> revision by John Matthews comes in second place.
> It does do crop it, but is less perfect of a
> crop than the first method listed.
> For instance in the second program,
> the image is not as sharp and clear.

Kudos for comparing. What interpolationType did you use?

<http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/awt/image/AffineTransformOp.html>

Back to comp.lang.java.help | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Work around requested bH <bherbst65@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-17 19:03 -0800
  Re: Work around requested Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-17 19:19 -0800
    Re: Work around requested "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-12-18 01:36 -0500
      Re: Work around requested Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-17 23:39 -0800
      Re: Work around requested bH <bherbst65@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-18 21:01 -0800
        Re: Work around requested bH <bherbst65@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-20 15:46 -0800
          Re: Work around requested Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-12-20 16:53 -0800
            Re: Work around requested bH <bherbst65@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-20 17:02 -0800
              Re: Work around requested Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-12-20 20:43 -0800
          Re: Work around requested "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-12-20 20:13 -0500
            Re: Work around requested bH <bherbst65@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-20 17:33 -0800
              Re: Work around requested Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-12-20 20:47 -0800
                Re: Work around requested bH <bherbst65@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-21 13:58 -0800
                Re: Work around requested Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-12-21 16:09 -0800
                Re: Work around requested bH <bherbst65@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-21 18:58 -0800
                Re: Work around requested Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-12-21 19:09 -0800
                Re: Work around requested bH <bherbst65@hotmail.com> - 2011-12-21 18:50 -0800
  Re: Work around requested Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-18 12:51 -0800
    Re: Work around requested Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2011-12-24 02:18 +0100

csiph-web