Re: Murphy's law

From	"A. W. Dunstan" <no@spam.thanks>
Organization	OptiMetrics, Inc.
Date	2012-01-06 12:24 -0500
Subject	Re: Murphy's law
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.help
References	<s9i4g7divm98k0drp6ss28qnjmig3k2t43@4ax.com>
Followup-To	comp.lang.java.help
Message-ID	<QYGdnbIh5e2ls5rSnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@megapath.net> (permalink)

Followups directed to: comp.lang.java.help

Show all headers | View raw

And remember, Murphy was an optimist.

Roedy Green wrote:

> I have just written an entry for "Murphy's Law" in the Java glossary.
> Included is a mildly amusing anecdote that happened to me yesterday
> that illustrates the principle.
> 
> This is a light hearted entry.  If you have ideas please email me via
> the feedback at the bottom of the page.
> 
> http://mindprod.com/jgloss/murphy.html

-- 
Al Dunstan, Software Engineer
OptiMetrics, Inc.
3115 Professional Drive
Ann Arbor, MI  48104-5131

"There are two ways of constructing a software design.  One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies.  And the
other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious
deficiencies."
            - C. A. R. Hoare

Back to comp.lang.java.help | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Murphy's law Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-01-02 17:06 -0800
  Re: Murphy's law Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-01-02 17:53 -0800
  Re: Murphy's law "A. W. Dunstan" <no@spam.thanks> - 2012-01-06 12:24 -0500
  Re: Murphy's law rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2012-01-07 14:56 +0000
  Re: Murphy's law Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2012-01-07 10:43 -0800
    Re: Murphy's law Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-07 11:53 -0800
      Re: Murphy's law Paul Cager <paul.cager@googlemail.com> - 2012-01-16 09:33 -0800
        Re: Murphy's law Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-16 14:49 -0800

csiph-web