Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.gui > #3982
| From | "Peter Duniho" <peter.duniho@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Anti-aliasing in imag |
| Message-ID | <op.ufu3mmsn8jd0ej@petes-computer.local> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.gui |
| References | <48a3826d$0$2239$ec3e2dad@news.usenetmonster.com><op.ufuticmp8jd0ej@pet |
| Date | 2011-04-27 15:48 +0000 |
| Organization | TDS.net |
To: comp.lang.java.gui,comp.l On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:00:32 -0700, Kenneth P. Turvey <kt-usenet@squeakydolphin.com> wrote: > [...] > After this the image still doesn't look anti-aliased. It seems like the > clipping region is either on or off. > > Do you see anything in the code that might be the problem? Any other > suggestions? Nope. Your code looks fine to me (not sure why you want ABGR instead of ARGB, but either works fine on my computer). Using basically the same code here, it generates an anti-aliased circular subset of the original image, just as intended. Java 5, Mac OS 10.4.11 My best guess: you are either using some Java implementation that has poor or non-existent anti-aliasing support, or you're just mistaken about whether the results are anti-aliased or not. I admit, by default I'd assume that neither is the case, but given that the code is simple and it works fine here, I've got to assume one or the other is actually the case after all. :) If you're not using an up-to-date, mainstream Java implementation, then you should try the same code on one that is. If you already are (or if doing so produces the same results), then maybe you can post an example image that's been processed by your code somewhere that we can download and look at it. Pete --- * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet! --- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.gui | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Anti-aliasing in image cl "Kenneth P. Turvey" <kenneth.p..turvey@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:48 +0000
Re: Anti-aliasing in imag "Peter Duniho" <peter.duniho@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:48 +0000
Re: Anti-aliasing in imag "Kenneth P. Turvey" <kenneth.p..turvey@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:48 +0000
Re: Anti-aliasing in imag "John B. Matthews" <john.b..matthews@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:48 +0000
Re: Anti-aliasing in imag "Kenneth P. Turvey" <kenneth.p..turvey@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:48 +0000
Re: Anti-aliasing in imag "Peter Duniho" <peter.duniho@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:48 +0000
Re: Anti-aliasing in imag "Kenneth P. Turvey" <kenneth.p..turvey@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:48 +0000
Re: Anti-aliasing in imag "Peter Duniho" <peter.duniho@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:48 +0000
Re: Anti-aliasing in imag "Kenneth P. Turvey" <kenneth.p..turvey@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:48 +0000
Re: Anti-aliasing in imag "Kenneth P. Turvey" <kenneth.p..turvey@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:48 +0000
Re: Anti-aliasing in imag "Peter Duniho" <peter.duniho@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:48 +0000
Re: Anti-aliasing in imag "John B. Matthews" <john.b..matthews@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:48 +0000
csiph-web