Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.gui > #2382
| From | "Lew" <lew@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Flickering problem in |
| Message-ID | <HeSdnTSDGscjREPbnZ2dnUVZ_oTinZ2d@comcast.com> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.gui |
| References | <46dead72$0$28511$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au> |
| Date | 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000 |
| Organization | TDS.net |
To: comp.lang.java.gui "Lew" wrote: >> Does Swing have more "overhead" than AWT? >> >> What is the nature of that extra overhead? >> >> These are things I don't know. Qu0ll wrote: > Lew, > > It's just my poor choice of words on this occasion. > There is absolutely nothing wrong with Swing (in fact I love it). > I am simply experimenting with the possibilities of AWT at this stage. > Anyway, what does it matter *why* I am doing what I am doing? > I have encountered a problem and am looking for assistance. > I don't think I need to justify the purpose of my activities. How do you get a question of "why" from my request for information about Swing's overhead? I didn't ask you why you chose to do what you're doing, nor did I ask you to justify your decision, nor did I offer any opinion about the relative superiority of either widget set. I asked for technical information about Swing and AWT. To answer your direct question, it doesn't matter to my question why you are doing what you're doing. I agree that you do not need to justify the purpose of your activities; in fact, I am not actually interested in that purpose nor its justification. I offer thanks to Roedy for the information I requested. -- Lew --- * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet! --- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.gui | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Flickering problem in sim "Qu0ll" <qu0ll@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Roedy Green" <roedy.green@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Qu0ll" <qu0ll@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Roedy Green" <roedy.green@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Qu0ll" <qu0ll@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Andrew Thompson" <andrew.thompson@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Qu0ll" <qu0ll@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Lew" <lew@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Qu0ll" <qu0ll@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Lew" <lew@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Qu0ll" <qu0ll@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Lew" <lew@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Andrew Thompson" <andrew.thompson@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Qu0ll" <qu0ll@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Roedy Green" <roedy.green@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
Re: Flickering problem in "Andrew Thompson" <andrew.thompson@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:38 +0000
csiph-web