Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.gui > #323
| From | "Bart Cremers" <bart.cremers@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: setCellRenderer for s |
| Message-ID | <1165240545.174061.100890@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.gui |
| References | <1165234528.860255.138590@n67g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> |
| Date | 2011-04-27 15:26 +0000 |
| Organization | TDS.net |
To: comp.lang.java.gui On Dec 4, 1:15 pm, "Nickolay Cherkezishvili" <nickol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Imagine that your project is grown up to 30000 code lines, and you have > many different JTables with many different renderers. Than you will see > that my method is better, because it makes program logic easier to > understand by other programmers. Besides - in most cases it's better to > make your own JTable class by overriding original JTable. It's much > better to customize JTable and use it in your project. > > This is my own opinion :) I'm not going to discuss if your method is better or not. That's probably a matter of taste. Could you show (or point me) to some sample code to prove your point? I can't imagine on how you implement this cleaner by overriding JTable. I can easily imagine 30000 code lines in my projects by the way, as I'm working on 500,000+ code lines projects for the past 7 years :) Bart --- * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet! --- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.gui | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: setCellRenderer for s "Bart Cremers" <bart.cremers@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:26 +0000
csiph-web