Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.databases > #9

[OT] Conversation threading (was: Accessing 2 tables having same name but different databases ms-access)

From Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.databases
Subject [OT] Conversation threading (was: Accessing 2 tables having same name but different databases ms-access)
Date 2011-04-27 08:32 +0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <ip89p7$h39$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <9311e87d-c9a8-43bb-b4ab-762ac5735f78@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <ip4jgl$4gh$1@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:54:00 -0400, /Lew/:
> David Lee Lambert wrote:
>
>> What do you mean "no result"? Does "next()" return false for both
>> rs2_1 and rs?
>
> David, please do NOT respond to Usenet posts with an email to
> "xxx@googlegroups.com", nor in such a way as to create a
> "Reply-To:". It fragments the conversation and is insufferably rude.
> Just use regular reply to the newsgroup so that the headers align.
> Ok, please? No more rudeness?

Lew, the problem with conversation fragmentation on your side comes 
from Thunderbird's default settings [1], also.  David's reply has 
correct In-Reply-To header, but then doesn't include References 
header as it comes from some mail gateway rather than being sent by 
a proper News client.  Still having proper In-Reply-To should be 
enough to have a correct threading, given the original is also 
present in the thread.

Try setting your "mail.strict_threading" to false, then rebuild the 
group index ("Repair Folder" from the "Folder Properties" dialog on 
SeaMonkey - I guess it should be similar for Thunderbird), to see if 
it helps.

[1] 
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Message_Threading#mail.strict_threading>, 
<http://kb.mozillazine.org/Stop_threading_by_subject>

-- 
Stanimir

Back to comp.lang.java.databases | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Accessing 2 tables having same name but different databases ms-access David Lee Lambert <davidl@lmert.com> - 2011-04-25 08:15 -0700
  Re: Accessing 2 tables having same name but different databases ms-access Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-25 15:54 -0400
    [OT] Conversation threading (was: Accessing 2 tables having same name but different databases ms-access) Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-04-27 08:32 +0300
      Re: [OT] Conversation threading (was: Accessing 2 tables having same name but different databases ms-access) Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-04-27 11:51 +0000
        Re: [OT] Conversation threading Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-27 08:28 -0400
          Re: [OT] Conversation threading Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-04-27 12:52 +0000
            Re: [OT] Conversation threading Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-27 20:25 +0200
        Re: [OT] Conversation threading Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-27 20:28 +0200

csiph-web