Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.databases > #9
| From | Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.databases |
| Subject | [OT] Conversation threading (was: Accessing 2 tables having same name but different databases ms-access) |
| Date | 2011-04-27 08:32 +0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ip89p7$h39$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <9311e87d-c9a8-43bb-b4ab-762ac5735f78@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <ip4jgl$4gh$1@news.albasani.net> |
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 15:54:00 -0400, /Lew/:
> David Lee Lambert wrote:
>
>> What do you mean "no result"? Does "next()" return false for both
>> rs2_1 and rs?
>
> David, please do NOT respond to Usenet posts with an email to
> "xxx@googlegroups.com", nor in such a way as to create a
> "Reply-To:". It fragments the conversation and is insufferably rude.
> Just use regular reply to the newsgroup so that the headers align.
> Ok, please? No more rudeness?
Lew, the problem with conversation fragmentation on your side comes
from Thunderbird's default settings [1], also. David's reply has
correct In-Reply-To header, but then doesn't include References
header as it comes from some mail gateway rather than being sent by
a proper News client. Still having proper In-Reply-To should be
enough to have a correct threading, given the original is also
present in the thread.
Try setting your "mail.strict_threading" to false, then rebuild the
group index ("Repair Folder" from the "Folder Properties" dialog on
SeaMonkey - I guess it should be similar for Thunderbird), to see if
it helps.
[1]
<https://wiki.mozilla.org/MailNews:Message_Threading#mail.strict_threading>,
<http://kb.mozillazine.org/Stop_threading_by_subject>
--
Stanimir
Back to comp.lang.java.databases | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Accessing 2 tables having same name but different databases ms-access David Lee Lambert <davidl@lmert.com> - 2011-04-25 08:15 -0700
Re: Accessing 2 tables having same name but different databases ms-access Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-25 15:54 -0400
[OT] Conversation threading (was: Accessing 2 tables having same name but different databases ms-access) Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2011-04-27 08:32 +0300
Re: [OT] Conversation threading (was: Accessing 2 tables having same name but different databases ms-access) Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-04-27 11:51 +0000
Re: [OT] Conversation threading Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-27 08:28 -0400
Re: [OT] Conversation threading Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-04-27 12:52 +0000
Re: [OT] Conversation threading Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-27 20:25 +0200
Re: [OT] Conversation threading Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-27 20:28 +0200
csiph-web