Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.databases > #145
| From | kuassi.mensah@gmail.com.remove-dii-this |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Connection Pooling |
| Message-ID | <a780b557-ff3c-4e51-bc40-29ccd74690af@s21g2000prm.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.databases |
| References | <483b75f0$0$90275$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
| Date | 2011-04-27 15:22 +0000 |
| Organization | TDS.net |
To: comp.lang.java.programmer > > The problem with middle-tier connection pools is that they cannot span > > JVMs or midlet0er instances. > > That is not a problem. It is an advantage. Because interacting with pool > is then a local call. The saving of local call to connection pool versus remote call to the connection broker, is epsilon compared to the saving in terms of resource brought by DRCP. > > Oracle's Database Resident Connecton Pool > >http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/php/pdf/php-scalability-ha-twp.pdf > > solves this problem; unfortunately it is not (yet) exposed to Java > > only PHP and Ruby/Rails (primarily because these are process based not > > thread based). > > That solution is used not because it is a better solution, but > because the traditional Java/.NET/C++ solution does not work with PHP. Sure, unlike PHP and other dynamic languages, Java/.NET/C++ are not in desperate need for a connection pool. > You can use DRCP from Java. Nope, the article you are referring to is wrong; and i am as we speak asking the author to fix the misleading JDBC URL with DRCP. > http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/articles/oracle-database-11g-top... > > describes how to specify the JDBC connection URL. > > I think the interest from Java will be low. A local pool is faster. I will argue with this opinion. Think about a large web application with thousands of middle-tier (let's assume 4000) with each their own connection pool. Even if each middle-tier only allocate few connections (let's settle for 5); you end up with 20,000 pre-allocated connections!!! Assuming that only 50% of all connections are busy at a point in time and that this is not uniform across all middle-tiers (how could it be?); you will be wasting 10,000 connections. Kuassi --- * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet! --- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.databases | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Connection Pooling "Chase Preuninger" <chase.preuninger@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Connection Pooling "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arne_Vajh=" <=?iso-8859-1?q?arne_vajh=@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:22 +0000
Re: Connection Pooling kuassi.mensah@gmail.com.remove-dii-this - 2011-04-27 15:22 +0000
Re: Connection Pooling "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arne_Vajh=" <=?iso-8859-1?q?arne_vajh=@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:22 +0000
Re: Connection Pooling kuassi.mensah@gmail.com.remove-dii-this - 2011-04-27 15:22 +0000
Re: Connection Pooling "Alfred" <alfred@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:22 +0000
csiph-web