Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.databases > #240
| From | "nicola" <nicola@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Java Toplink Essentia |
| Message-ID | <94fbb4e7-4d7e-4005-a905-6e43df312c80@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.databases |
| References | <cqWdnWKfq97dBlXVnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@comcast.co |
| Date | 2011-04-27 15:22 +0000 |
| Organization | TDS.net |
To: comp.lang.java.databases Hi guys, thanks a lot for your answers. I agree with you but my boss wants this solution. He said "To much rows for one table...." [some thousands]. Maybe because we use H2 Database Engine although H2 has very good performances. I don't understand his "brain engine". Thanks again. Nicola --- * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet! --- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.databases | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Java Toplink Essentia "nicola" <nicola@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:22 +0000 Re: Java Toplink Essentia "RedGrittyBrick" <redgrittybrick@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:22 +0000
csiph-web