Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.databases > #55
| From | "David Segall" <david.segall@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Designing a structure |
| Message-ID | <5gno14tv1ki40qfeoko806joq81c7atdti@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.databases |
| References | <dvGdneauJ-0uKIbVnZ2dnUVZ_t3inZ2d@comcast.com> |
| Date | 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000 |
| Organization | TDS.net |
To: comp.databases,comp.lang. Lew <lew@lewscanon.com> wrote: >David Segall wrote: >> The history of computing has been about finding the "true correct" >> data model or user interface and _then_ optimising features including >> the ones you list. > >That is completely false. > Studies and experience have consistently shown that >there is more than one "correct" solution for almost every software >requirement. The history of computing has notably omitted attempts to find >any "true correct" data model or user interface, and has focused instead on >elucidating principles by which *a* correct solution can be found in any given >situation. I believe that the relational database, the spreadsheet, the Xerox Alto user interface, the Java-style virtual machine, hypertext and the world wide web are all examples of the "correct" model. Each of those models was so intuitively right that they persisted despite the fact that many of the early implementations were unacceptable. Of course, those historical milestones do not contradict your second sentence. > >> I believed my original post indicated that I had thought about the >> problem, looked at other people's solutions and that I was coming to >> you because I was not satisfied with anything I had seen so far. I >> assumed that the post spoke for itself and, even if it did not, a >> respondent would do a Google search before making assumptions about >> the poster. Clearly, my post was not as lucid as it seemed to me >> because this is the fourth response based on an elementary database >> design course. I was seeking a breakthrough data model of a personal >> address book that one of you had thought of in the shower this >> morning. > >In other words, you couldn't come up with the idea, and since Ed and others >didn't, now it's their fault. I apologise for the grumpy tone. I am frustrated that I can't come up with a simple model for what seems like a simple application but I am certainly not blaming anyone else. --- * Synchronet * The Whitehouse BBS --- whitehouse.hulds.com --- check it out free usenet! --- Synchronet 3.15a-Win32 NewsLink 1.92 Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.databases | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Designing a structure for "David Segall" <david.segall@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Ed Prochak" <ed.prochak@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "David Segall" <david.segall@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Martin Gregorie" <martin.gregorie@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "David Segall" <david.segall@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Ed Prochak" <ed.prochak@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Arved Sandstrom" <arved.sandstrom@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Ed Prochak" <ed.prochak@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "David Segall" <david.segall@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Lew" <lew@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "David Segall" <david.segall@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "David Cressey" <david.cressey@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "David Segall" <david.segall@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Lew" <lew@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "David Segall" <david.segall@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Ed Prochak" <ed.prochak@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Lew" <lew@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "David Segall" <david.segall@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Roedy Green" <roedy.green@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "ram" <ram@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Arved Sandstrom" <arved.sandstrom@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "ram" <ram@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Arved Sandstrom" <arved.sandstrom@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Lew" <lew@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "David Segall" <david.segall@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Marco" <marco@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Arved Sandstrom" <arved.sandstrom@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
Re: Designing a structure "Marco" <marco@THRWHITE.remove-dii-this> - 2011-04-27 15:21 +0000
csiph-web