Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #25068
| From | "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: OT: one TeraBYTE RAM chip |
| Date | 2013-08-07 18:10 -0400 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <op.w1gvvgue0e5s1z@-> (permalink) |
| References | <f9e96b5b-4814-419a-acbf-c7cc86a44a23@googlegroups.com> <op.w1ebbbnb0e5s1z@-> <91f3fea0-3a6e-4855-97f5-3fe8812e717a@googlegroups.com> |
On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 09:22:22 -0400, Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Tuesday, August 6, 2013 1:51:01 PM UTC+1, Rod Pemberton wrote: >> If that's correct, then it's fast enough to be used for main memory >> too, not just storage. I.e., it offers the possibility of integration >> of main memory and permanent storage. If so, that's one giant leap >> forward. > > *Exactly* what I was thinking. Time to go long on these boys! > > This is bad news for the "cloud" storage crowd, too! The NSA and their spying is bad news for "cloud" storage. No one wants the US government in their business, even if it's 100% legal... Those with power simply can't be trusted with it. That was the point of three branches of government in the US. That was when the US government was small. Today, with a monstrously large US government, we need like 36 branches or so to maintain impotence, er.. incompetence, uh.. inefectiveness, ... I mean balance. This 384GB memory article came up today. They use 3D: 24 layers of 16GB chips. So, maybe 1TB is not quite such an improvement... http://news.yahoo.com/samsung-chips-could-lead-smartphones-384gb-storage-014502632.html RP -- "... to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it ..." -Thomas Jefferson, Declaration of Independence, 1776
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
OT: one TeraBYTE RAM chip Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-08-06 04:20 -0700
Re: OT: one TeraBYTE RAM chip "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-08-06 08:51 -0400
Re: OT: one TeraBYTE RAM chip Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-08-06 06:22 -0700
Re: OT: one TeraBYTE RAM chip "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-08-07 18:10 -0400
Re: OT: one TeraBYTE RAM chip Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-08-06 07:42 -0700
Re: OT: one TeraBYTE RAM chip Syd Rumpo <usenet@nononono.co.uk> - 2013-08-06 16:46 +0100
csiph-web