Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #133789
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: docker, what could be the advantage? |
| References | <nnd$183177d6$36b3681c@f0aabdece3e0eb21> <5b871bb3d8bc9fc9ba75933f1b5e2580@www.novabbs.com> |
| From | albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl |
| Message-ID | <nnd$0299ed2e$167a8a25@c01352f2405cb8ca> (permalink) |
| Organization | KPN B.V. |
| Date | 2025-06-20 14:45 +0200 |
In article <5b871bb3d8bc9fc9ba75933f1b5e2580@www.novabbs.com>,
LIT <zbigniew2011@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 12:19:51 +0000, albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl wrote:
>
>> I came upon
>> https://github.com/uho/docker-forth
>>
>> with a plethora of Forths.
>> [If you are interested in ciforth, you could have the latest
>> release from github..ciforth ]
>
>I wanted to give a try to forth32.com (binary
>from ms2d148.zip archive) but it doesn't work.
>Tried it under FreeDOS, MS-DOS 6.22 and DOSEMU
>with FreeDOS, on two different machines.
>It just shows the blinking screen and hangs
>the whole system.
I realised that you run one of my programs, fetched from
https://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst/figforth.html
You post to the world and you expect every Chinese to
understand what you are talking about?
It is better that you provide context, and also sign your
messages, if need be with a pseudonum.
> Maybe it does require some special configuration, anything?
How would you expect a 32 bit Forth to work under MSDOS?
Of course it needs a special configuration.
This is explained in README.TXT. How could you have guessed?
Groetjes Albert
--
The Chinese government is satisfied with its military superiority over USA.
The next 5 year plan has as primary goal to advance life expectancy
over 80 years, like Western Europe.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
docker, what could be the advantage? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-16 14:19 +0200
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2025-06-16 16:18 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? minforth@gmx.net (minforth) - 2025-06-16 16:59 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-16 19:27 +0200
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2025-06-16 17:40 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-18 19:55 +0200
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2025-06-16 18:00 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-16 20:48 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2025-06-18 17:00 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-18 19:28 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2025-06-18 21:04 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-19 12:41 +1000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-19 12:36 +1000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? mhx@iae.nl (mhx) - 2025-06-19 07:19 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? dxf <dxforth@gmail.com> - 2025-06-20 02:02 +1000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-18 13:25 +0200
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-20 10:46 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? minforth@gmx.net (minforth) - 2025-06-20 12:05 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-20 14:45 +0200
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-20 13:09 +0000
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2025-06-20 20:53 +0200
Re: docker, what could be the advantage? zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) - 2025-06-20 19:21 +0000
csiph-web